Unknown

Amero sentencing delayed yet again (Download Squad)

May 19th 2007 1:19AM Yes, but her best chance stands at a successful petition to the governor of Conneticut for a pardon, but that of course first requires her to be sentenced, and the moral outrage causing the flood of signatures of petition to the governor.

That all can't happen until she's sentenced. Which brings up a curious point. Would it be better for a sympathetic judge to give her the harshest punishment possible to draw the most attention to its absurdity and increase the chances for an expedient and fair resolution, or give her the lightest sentence possible where the non-severity of the punishment would not engender the same kind of outrage, but would threaten to stick her with the felonies for the rest of her life?