Microsoft shuts down spam behemoth Rustock, reduces worldwide spam by 39%
Microsoft's Digital Crimes Unit, working with federal law enforcement agents, has brought down the world's largest spam network, Rustock.
Rustock, at its peak, was a botnet of around 2 million spam-sending zombies capable of sending out 30 billion spam email per day. Microsoft's wholesale slaughter of Rustock could reduce worldwide spam output by up to 39%.
Rustock was taken down, piece by piece, in a similar way to the Mega-D botnet. First the master controllers, the machines that send out commands to enslaved zombies, were identified. Microsoft quickly seized some of these machines located in the U.S. for further analysis, and worked with police in the Netherlands to disable some of the command structure outside of the U.S.
With the immediate threat disabled, Microsoft then worked with upstream providers to black hole the IP addresses of whoever was controlling the botnet. To prevent further master controllers popping up, Microsoft worked with Chinese CN-CERT to block registration of domains that could be used by new command and control servers.
Finally, Microsoft is now working with ISPs and CERTs around the world to help clean the Rustock malware from around 1 million infected machines. It's also worth noting that Microsoft didn't do this alone; specialists from Pfizer, FireEye (the company behind the Mega-D botnet takedown), and the University of Washington helped out.
Why Pfizer you ask? Because Rustock's spam is mostly of the pharmaceutical kind. The drugs advertised in such spam are rarely the real deal. They can contain the wrong active ingredients, or the wrong dosage. Not only did Rustock spam cut into Pfizer's profits, but it might have been killing people too.
If you want to prevent your own computers from becoming botnet zombies, make sure you install anti-malware software, such as Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware.
Rustock, at its peak, was a botnet of around 2 million spam-sending zombies capable of sending out 30 billion spam email per day. Microsoft's wholesale slaughter of Rustock could reduce worldwide spam output by up to 39%.
Rustock was taken down, piece by piece, in a similar way to the Mega-D botnet. First the master controllers, the machines that send out commands to enslaved zombies, were identified. Microsoft quickly seized some of these machines located in the U.S. for further analysis, and worked with police in the Netherlands to disable some of the command structure outside of the U.S.
With the immediate threat disabled, Microsoft then worked with upstream providers to black hole the IP addresses of whoever was controlling the botnet. To prevent further master controllers popping up, Microsoft worked with Chinese CN-CERT to block registration of domains that could be used by new command and control servers.
Finally, Microsoft is now working with ISPs and CERTs around the world to help clean the Rustock malware from around 1 million infected machines. It's also worth noting that Microsoft didn't do this alone; specialists from Pfizer, FireEye (the company behind the Mega-D botnet takedown), and the University of Washington helped out.
Why Pfizer you ask? Because Rustock's spam is mostly of the pharmaceutical kind. The drugs advertised in such spam are rarely the real deal. They can contain the wrong active ingredients, or the wrong dosage. Not only did Rustock spam cut into Pfizer's profits, but it might have been killing people too.
If you want to prevent your own computers from becoming botnet zombies, make sure you install anti-malware software, such as Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware.













Comments
25
Subscribe to commentsTechmasterMar 18th 2011 8:23PM
Microsoft might be evil in some of the ways it treats other businesses, but I assure you, Apple and Google have FAR worse business practices. Apple and Google are doing so well because they have great products/services, but Microsoft would never be allowed to treat other businesses the way Apple and Google do. The thing I believe is Microsoft's biggest downfall is the fact that they charge so much for their software. They need to lower the entry point prices, which they have been working on lately, but the entry level versions of their OSes are actually crippled. Why make the OS run slower and not multitask just so you can charge less for it? Just give consumers a $50 version of Windows, and charge businesses $100. That would be fair, and there would be a lot less piracy.
But, imagine what would happen if Microsoft announced that they were going to start making PC hardware, and that Windows would ONLY run on that hardware. Do you think they would get sued?
Kevin CarnageMar 18th 2011 8:26PM
Microsoft is a powerful force on the web. They have created a browsing environment that is more spam free. On the other hand, is it right that the monopolizing company is the one putting smaller companies like this out of business just because they can?
Elías du HaldeMar 20th 2011 6:59PM
is it no right that the monopolizing in INTERNET, NEOPRESS REMEMBER THAT!
bizbee259Mar 21st 2011 3:07PM
so, you're a spammer, is that the trouble?
Rudy CMar 22nd 2011 12:29AM
@bizbee259 now i hope my gmail emails wont go into my friends hotmail spam folder