Google attacks content farms by altering search algorithm, early results are promising
Last week, to make inroads against the deluge of page-scraping content farms, Google carried out some changes to the way it ranks search results.The slow-but-sure subsuming of search results by content farms begun last year, but only really came to a head in January with a post by Stack Overflow co-founder Jeff Atwood. An outcry from the community followed, and culminated in a post by Matt Cutts on the Official Google Blog.
Google still seems to be downplaying the problem, saying that most Search users simply weren't affected by the content farms. Cutts says that the recent changes will only alter "less than half a percent of search results."
The net result, though, is that you should find the original source of content when searching Google -- and judging by our own traffic graphs here at Download Squad (there are a lot of content farms that replicate our posts), it does seem to have made a difference.












Comments
3
Subscribe to commentsJoe SJan 31st 2011 1:44PM
Good to hear. How about showing some of your traffic graphs? You don't have to show actual numbers, I just would like to see the trend.
Sebastian AnthonyJan 31st 2011 1:52PM
@Joe S I don't think I (or we) are allowed to.
Also, we published some good stuff last week, so that will undoubtedly affect the statistics too :)
I would say we gained by about 10% from the week before (just a rough glance at the graphs... I ain't going to do the maths :P)
nuttywebJan 31st 2011 6:51PM
Does this mean that Google will stop crawling its own News site? I understand original content owners getting upset when their posts get ripped off without any type of link back to the original article or post or attribution, BUT if someone does make the acknowledgement and attributes where the article content came from then why is Google and everyone else penalizing these blogs/content providers, etc.? I mean is this not what Google went through different court systems to win the right to do? Just trying to start a discussion.