Spam Clock illustrates the problem of link relevancy for Google, Bing, and other search engines
If you've wondered about the recent slow droop in search result relevancy, take a look at Spam Clock; watch the counter tick up, be amazed, or be appalled. Believe it or not, over 220 million spam Web pages have been created since January 1. That's one million spam pages per hour, or about 270 new spam websites every second.Spam Clock just scratches the surface of the problem, though. The real story is about spam and scraper websites making money from the hard work of other sites. These sites place highly in search results -- sometimes above the real websites -- and make money from Google AdSense -- it's all a little bit convoluted. Hopefully search giants like Google and Bing are working on a solution, but it may just be that the Web is finally growing too fast for conventional indexing.
This may also be one of the strongest signals that link sharing through Facebook, Twitter and other social sites is the way forward. Imagine searching an index of your friends' favorite ('liked') websites, rather than a spam-ridden search engine index. Today, our social graphs might be too small to cover the entire Web, but in a few years...
Update: In an interview with Adotas, the CEO of Blekko (the company behind Spam Clock) says that the spam calculation is "an extrapolation based on the growth of the web and the fraction of spam that we're seeing."












Comments
9
Subscribe to commentsChrisSskJan 10th 2011 8:06AM
I just googled this article's title "Spam Clock illustrates the problem of link relevancy for Google, Bing, and other search engines" with quotes to find the exact same wording and it returned 733 results. Some are from "sister sites" like joystiq and tuaw that show articles at the bottom but most are just reposting of the article
Sebastian AnthonyJan 10th 2011 8:08AM
@ChrisSsk Haha, cool :) That's an interesting test -- and a pretty scary result...
MxxConJan 10th 2011 8:47AM
how about disclose that this fake "clock" was created by blekko.com, a site that attempts to be a competitor to google?
hardly an objective source.
Sebastian AnthonyJan 10th 2011 8:57AM
@MxxCon Just because it was made by a competitor doesn't mean it's fake...!
MxxConJan 10th 2011 10:36AM
@Sebastian Anthony it is fake. there is no scientific proof these numbers are accurate. this is not an actual counter but just a javascript with some numbers.
if i make betterspamclock.com, copy the same javascript, just add a few more 0's to look more impressive, will you write an article about it as well?
the whole point for this site to exist is to indirectly advertise blekko by linking to articles that claim that google search results are full of spam.
if you don't see/understand this then you are either really gullible or worse intentionally misleading your readers.
Sebastian AnthonyJan 10th 2011 12:31PM
@MxxCon Heya. Sorry, our shitty commenting system ate my last response, so here's my shorter version:
--
Basically, the figures are from the CEO of a search engine -- and a search engine that seems to provide pretty good results.
I have updated the post with a link to an interview with the CEO -- he says how the figures are derived.
ChrisSskJan 10th 2011 1:53PM
@MxxCon
of course its a javascript, I think its obvious that the number displayed on the clock is not intended to mean that the number of spam sites is known down to the last site. The clock is an estimate based on the company's findings.
ConsumerJoeJan 10th 2011 4:40PM
@ Sebastian Anthony.... Seems like the gauntlet has been thrown down and picked up. What is the science behind this and how accurate is it? We see way too many baloney made up numbers and stats these days.... Give us a reason to buy this article...
michael anthony gajdosFeb 12th 2011 5:09PM
Spam will not be stoppped in social networks...
To suggest that spam will not continue in social networks is either an ad for theses networks or naive optimism at best. Already starrs get paid to per post by ad agencies...spammers will simply evolve...
the root is how we as a free society conduct bussiness and as long as society keeps dreaming of getting rich overnight it will keep on going