News flash: everything on the Internet is hackable

Like all major disasters, though, this hack serves a higher purpose: it's now blatantly clear that you should not trust a website with sensitive details about yourself. There have been other hacks, of course; higher profile hacks (like the TJ Maxx debacle), with millions of credit card and social security numbers vanishing into the ether, causing billions of dollars of damage.
But they pale in comparison to the Gawker hack for one reason: it directly affected a huge swathe of the noisy, foot-stomping and petulant tech blogging minority.
War
Think about it: war is a terrible thing, but as long as it's happening far away and no one close to you dies, life marches on. By analogy, imagine if Habbo Hotel had been breached, rather than Gawker. "Poor kids" we'd mutter to ourselves, both unaffected and unfazed. It would probably warrant a couple of blog posts on Mashable, nothing more.
While the hackers disclaim any connection to 4Chan, they admit in an interview that Gawker's earlier spat with 4Chan is what brought them into focus. As always with such hacks, Gnosis stresses just how easy the hack was. "Anyone could have gotten their hands on this info." And therein lies the problem: No one is safe from hacking. Even a modern, Web-based company with tech blogs like Lifehacker, Gizmodo and Kotaku was woefully insecure with passwords that could be cracked with antiquated hardware.
Later in the same interview, Gnosis says rather plainly "everyone is fair game on the Internet," which is true. The unstoppable march of technology and Moore's Law has taught us time and time again that, eventually, given enough time and determination, every wall will fall. It's unforgivable that Gawker used a disgustingly out-dated encryption method to hide its passwords. It's also hilariously awful that they thought their database was secure -- but ultimately it's neither here nor there. The fact is, hackers got into the system, and they could have done a lot worse than simply making the names and passwords public. There are military and governmental names in that database, and I bet there are some Microsoft and Google employees in there, too. Gnosis could have kept the entire hack private, and quietly extracted billions of dollars of intellectual property.
Data theft & democracy
This isn't something new, incidentally: data has been stolen since the beginning of time. Data -- knowledge, wisdom -- is the single most valuable creation of human culture. Once upon a time it was wax cylinders and sheets of papyrus that got stolen, and today it's digital files. It's humbling, and terrifying, but there's nothing we can do about it. Hacking, or modern-day data theft, is simply inevitable. If Gnosis doesn't hack your database, someone else will.Don't be tempted to blame cheap computers and faster processors for the problem, either. The real culprit is the Internet, a humble slave of a network, where status and rank have no currency, and every peer is ultimately equal. Any one of us is fair game. The Internet is democratization at its most pure, where speech is truly free and no single opinion has more intrinsic value than the next. The Internet is a classless society, and anyone that thinks otherwise will quickly be knocked down to size.
Safety
But what can be done about it? Is there no recourse, no sanctuary? You can start by choosing a secure password, but that won't help you if the custodian of your password is reckless. It's like giving a house key to a teenager -- safe enough, but more risky than not giving them a key. Using a different password for every website is a better solution. Of course, you could simply never sign up for anything -- but in a society that is fast becoming Web-centric, it's not like that's a real option.Really, if the Gawker hack has taught us anything, it's that no one -- especially tech bloggers -- should consider themselves loftier or more important than anyone else on the Internet. In fact, while the Internet is classless, there are strata, but there is only one divisor: knowledge. Military might, witty words and authority mean nothing on the Internet; only knowledge will set you apart -- and above -- from anyone else, and only knowledge will keep you safe.
Since writing this, it seems both DeviantART and McDonalds have also had their databases compromised. More details to follow.












Comments
28
Subscribe to commentsLorenDec 14th 2010 6:06PM
Like the real world, nothing online will ever be *completely* secure, I'm sure. Someone could pick the lock on your door if they wanted to. The only thing usually stopping them is that they don't want to.
I think the most important thing is that you've made the setup and preparations to fix things for yourself whenever something inevitably goes wrong, since we can't stop random chance or other people's maliciousness.
Sebastian AnthonyDec 14th 2010 6:06PM
@Loren "Be prepared!" -- one of the soundest pieces of advice ever. Thanks for the comment :)
SilverWaveDec 14th 2010 10:42PM
@Loren
Pick a secure pw anyway.
http://howsecureismypassword.net/
A8Akz#Bz4YV7
"It would take
About 100 million years
for a desktop PC to crack your password"
...unless the ppl you trust to store it are crap ;-)
(One of these said About 580 quadrillion years LOL).
RirathDec 14th 2010 6:20PM
Where are you hearing about DeviantArt and McDonalds?
RirathDec 14th 2010 6:24PM
@Rirath Actually, I've found a few results in Google. Wow, one of those weeks, huh?
pat_boy2008Dec 14th 2010 6:45PM
Great article. All this mess has got me questioning the all sites I use. I don't have a Gawker account, but I really do need to change some passwords.
Sebastian AnthonyDec 15th 2010 6:05AM
@pat_boy2008 I've always used different passwords, but more because I don't want to type an epic pass phrase for every single website out there.
Now... I'm very tempted to use something like LastPass.
NyaRDec 14th 2010 8:37PM
I like checking the mysql tables for passwords and seeing if they match up with the registered email
Drew GreenDec 14th 2010 9:25PM
LastPass ftw
DrakkenfyreDec 14th 2010 9:43PM
If you want to know if your email address was on the list, go to this site,
http://pajhome.org.uk/crypt/md5/
Put your email in in lower case, click MD5.
Take the MD5 hashtag, then go here.
http://www.google.com/fusiontables/DataSource?dsrcid=350662
Click "Show Options", Select "MD5", then put your hashtag in, click Apply.
This is an entire list of every email on the list. They have all been encrypted with a MD5 hashtag so no one else can read them. If you find anything on that list, your email address was leaked. If you don't find anything, your email address wasn't leaked.
Sebastian AnthonyDec 15th 2010 6:04AM
@Drakkenfyre Thanks for the link! I'm not on the list, thankfully, but I know a few people that were :(
SilverWaveDec 14th 2010 9:45PM
>Don't be tempted to blame cheap computers and faster processors for the problem, either. The real culprit is the Internet,
Rubbish, the only people to blame are Gawker.
Poor to non-existent security is due to their negligence pure and simple.
They had signs of being hacked a month ago and did very little.
see here: http://blogs.forbes.com/firewall/2010/12/13/the-lessons-of-gawkers-security-mess/
Quote:
"Warning Signs
On November 11th, Nick Denton received a notice that he had set up a new username and password at Gawker chat rooms. Because he knew he did not request this, and also had been told by someone else that he had been logged into Campfire (but also knew he had not), he asked members of his team to investigate. He did not however bother to change any of his other accounts that used the same password as his Campfire account."
SilverWaveDec 14th 2010 9:54PM
BTW you guys don't use DES to secure our details do you?
In fact it would be nice to get some general details on how they are stored.
MxxConDec 14th 2010 11:26PM
@SilverWave indeed it would be nice for AOL to disclose their security setup other than "trust us, it's secure".
security by obscurity is not security.
Sebastian AnthonyDec 15th 2010 6:01AM
@SilverWave Hey!
Yeah, that was actually on my mind as I wrote this. Honestly, I don't know about AOL's setup. I think it's been alluded to before, but there's a big divide between the writers, and the backend team.
I can try to find out -- but I don't think it's the kind of data that I'll be allowed to share :)
SilverWaveDec 14th 2010 10:06PM
Test :-)
FredDec 14th 2010 10:19PM
Yea, I got that email from DevArt a few days ago, just after the Gawker thing. Rough day to say the least...
bbourgeois87Dec 15th 2010 4:01PM
@SilverWave I got 19 sextillion years with my password. It's incredibly complex: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz methinks that the site only takes into account how many digits it is...
jfjbDec 14th 2010 11:53PM
security's needed to preserve insecurity
not to defend one self
go back in time
read what was said about 4chan
if I was him or her or it, I'd be f*c*i*g pissed too
blogging is about information
not defamation nor libel
my take
I may be wrong
but
mark
my
words
it's not over until the fat lady sings
who's the fat lady?
anyone here?
Kat2Dec 15th 2010 3:06AM
This article seems to have a lot of gloating in it.