New York Times Chrome Web app hands-on: jaw-droppingly awesome
Truth be told, I've never been sold on the whole Web apps paradigm. They're just websites! Very pretty websites, but ultimately... just websites. But it seems I was missing the point: while they're websites to you and I, publishers and developers see them as something else entirely. They see Web apps as beautiful, standardized, cross-platform tools for dissemination of their content and, of course, monetization. It's hard to sell a website, but a Web app on the other hand...
Take a look at the New York Times Web app, which I've just had the immense pleasure of playing around with. Notice how I gave you a Chrome Web Store link, but I could just as easily tell you to visit http://www.nytimes.com/chrome/# in Firefox 4 and it still works. Heck, it works in Firefox 3, too.
Don't let the 'oooh, Web app!!' distract you from the real gems, though. The layout is nothing like the website, and that's a good thing. Never has it been easier to switch between categories quickly -- seriously, the Web app blows the website out of the water, as far as content discovery goes. Then, there's the keyboard shortcuts, with the arrow keys allowing you to whisk through pages and stories with incredible ease.
Finally, and perhaps the best example of why Web apps are the wave of the future: visit the Web app's URL on your iPad. The experience is better than the actual iPad app. Even swiping works! (There are some iPad screenshots in the gallery below, too.)
Anyway, the best way to get to grips with the New York Times Web app is to play around with it yourself. If you don't have time, or if you're afraid of missing the good bits, have a look through our hands-on gallery below (again, make sure you view the images 'full size'). My initial impressions are excellent -- but the app is far from perfect. More analysis after the break.
For some reason, the font rendering seems a bit off (see image). I don't have any add-ons installed, and as far as I know my Windows 7 install is 'stock', so I'm not sure what's causing it. When a page loads, the font will start off looking normal, then 'flicker' a few times as it smooths. Ultimately, the text just looks blurry (which you can see in the screenshots, if you look closely). Another problem, which I only had in Firefox 4: it only worked once! After that, I got a navigation menu, but nothing on the left side. Curious.
As you will see in one of my screenshots, there are full-screen interstitial ads... but they failed to load (image). I don't have an ad-blocking add-on installed, so I figure this is just a temporary error. The square ads are very nice, though -- and also, interestingly, don't seem to appear on every Custom skin.
The Customize skins, incidentally, are awesome. Never has the beauty of marked-up text and elegant application of CSS been so apparent. It's worth playing with the NYT app just to toy around with the Customize tool.
Take a look at the New York Times Web app, which I've just had the immense pleasure of playing around with. Notice how I gave you a Chrome Web Store link, but I could just as easily tell you to visit http://www.nytimes.com/chrome/# in Firefox 4 and it still works. Heck, it works in Firefox 3, too.
Don't let the 'oooh, Web app!!' distract you from the real gems, though. The layout is nothing like the website, and that's a good thing. Never has it been easier to switch between categories quickly -- seriously, the Web app blows the website out of the water, as far as content discovery goes. Then, there's the keyboard shortcuts, with the arrow keys allowing you to whisk through pages and stories with incredible ease.
Finally, and perhaps the best example of why Web apps are the wave of the future: visit the Web app's URL on your iPad. The experience is better than the actual iPad app. Even swiping works! (There are some iPad screenshots in the gallery below, too.)
Anyway, the best way to get to grips with the New York Times Web app is to play around with it yourself. If you don't have time, or if you're afraid of missing the good bits, have a look through our hands-on gallery below (again, make sure you view the images 'full size'). My initial impressions are excellent -- but the app is far from perfect. More analysis after the break.
For some reason, the font rendering seems a bit off (see image). I don't have any add-ons installed, and as far as I know my Windows 7 install is 'stock', so I'm not sure what's causing it. When a page loads, the font will start off looking normal, then 'flicker' a few times as it smooths. Ultimately, the text just looks blurry (which you can see in the screenshots, if you look closely). Another problem, which I only had in Firefox 4: it only worked once! After that, I got a navigation menu, but nothing on the left side. Curious.
As you will see in one of my screenshots, there are full-screen interstitial ads... but they failed to load (image). I don't have an ad-blocking add-on installed, so I figure this is just a temporary error. The square ads are very nice, though -- and also, interestingly, don't seem to appear on every Custom skin.
The Customize skins, incidentally, are awesome. Never has the beauty of marked-up text and elegant application of CSS been so apparent. It's worth playing with the NYT app just to toy around with the Customize tool.














Comments
9
Subscribe to commentsk7of9Dec 8th 2010 1:23PM
I don't understand how anyone can feel this is better than the iPad app. if only just for the much smoother experience a true native app brings. It doesn't even load for me, so maybe it only works on 4.2.
The question is though, if the website and the app are both just websites, what's THE point of having two?
Thomas HoustonDec 8th 2010 1:32PM
Blanking at the moment. Does the iPad version let you select text?
kojo87Dec 8th 2010 1:40PM
when the consumer sees them as one thing while the publisher/developer sees them as another, don't we have a bit of a problem? if they think they are selling us a new premium product while we see it as the same old stuff we've always had, why should we buy it? the whole idea of "web app" seems like an oxymoron to me. more of a week attempt at dumbed down cloud computing. hell i don't even understand the majority of iPhone or Android apps. if the application needs to communicate with my hardware, make it a full out application. if it doesn't, why can't it just be offered as a website? i just don't understand apps like IMDB, YouTube or Engadget. why do they need apps when the website works just as well (if not better) no matter what device i view it on? the fact that this Chrome App works through essentially any browser shows me that this is just a website. an extremely nice one, but still just a website.
Martin-TDec 8th 2010 2:17PM
To quote Frank Drebbin: All right, move on! Nothing to see here! Please disperse! Nothing to see here. Please!
annoyingposter4Dec 8th 2010 2:17PM
i just removed download squad from my google reader feeds after reading this headline. this site has become nothing but an ad infused, over hyped log of dump. tell me with a straight face you werent paid to say this website passing as an app is "jaw dropping"
John StropeDec 8th 2010 2:27PM
Isn't this just the Times Skimmer that has been available on their web site for at least a year? It used to be a little button at the top of their page, but now it is a link in the Services menu to the left. I remember seeing this last year and thinking that it was being built for a tablet/iPad and thought it was pretty cool. But the chrome app doesn't look like anything new to me? Am I mistaken?
Thomas HoustonDec 8th 2010 2:35PM
@John Strope it's similar to the times skimmer, but significantly faster and with offline reading features.
JiDec 11th 2010 10:22PM
@John Strope
you're exactly right. thought the same thing immediately when i checked it out a few days ago. wtf is dls on about!? aren't you guys supposed to be leading the pack with this sort of 'insight'? very disappointing.
DDec 9th 2010 2:11PM
jolicloud os has had this app for a while i believe...