Internet Explorer 9 beta 2 leaks, looks ready for launch
The most recent build of IE9 -- beta 2 -- leaked onto the Web late last night. Judging by the version number and its performance, it looks like it features the same rendering and JavaScript engines found in Platform Preview 7.
As reported by WinRumors, there doesn't seem to be any significant change to the user interface. The download manager shows your current download speed without the need to mouse-over, but that's about it. It's now fairly safe to assume that Microsoft hasn't got any secret plans up its sleeve -- the UI you see now is almost certainly the real deal. If the final launch is in January, we can expect to see one more platform update in about 5 weeks, and then a final release towards the end of January.
I'm not going to give you a link to the IE9 beta 2 installer, but you can probably find it with a little searching on Twitter or Google. The installer is legit -- it's signed by Microsoft -- so you don't need to worry about malware of any variety.
As reported by WinRumors, there doesn't seem to be any significant change to the user interface. The download manager shows your current download speed without the need to mouse-over, but that's about it. It's now fairly safe to assume that Microsoft hasn't got any secret plans up its sleeve -- the UI you see now is almost certainly the real deal. If the final launch is in January, we can expect to see one more platform update in about 5 weeks, and then a final release towards the end of January.
I'm not going to give you a link to the IE9 beta 2 installer, but you can probably find it with a little searching on Twitter or Google. The installer is legit -- it's signed by Microsoft -- so you don't need to worry about malware of any variety.













Comments
16
Subscribe to commentsFezNov 23rd 2010 7:23AM
Awesome!
Downloaded. Installed. :D
FezNov 23rd 2010 8:45AM
@Fez
Oh and
32 bit : http://www.fileserve.com/file/gGPumfk
64 bit : http://www.fileserve.com/file/p5RJbKY
PotatoNov 23rd 2010 10:10AM
@Fez
x64 - http://www.mediafire.com/?hs54z72ldb2d0l5
x86 - http://www.mediafire.com/?nv2o53im7vy2m8w
Gilbert PalauNov 23rd 2010 9:20AM
Why the OP didnt post links? Thanks Fez!
Sebastian AnthonyNov 23rd 2010 9:44AM
@badr Because... well, we don't tend to link to illegitimate releases here on DLS :)
DrakkenfyreNov 23rd 2010 9:02PM
That would be a first.
You were more than happy to link to illegitimate sources before.
Gilbert PalauNov 23rd 2010 10:58AM
But according to TFA, It is legitimate:
"The installer is legit -- it's signed by Microsoft -- so you don't need to worry about malware of any variety."
So if it's legit, why not post the links? Fez did... what is wrong with that?
Sebastian AnthonyNov 23rd 2010 11:01AM
@badr I obviously can't condone the acts of one random, rampant commenter...
Gilbert PalauNov 23rd 2010 11:46AM
@(Unverified) you still didnt answer the question, if the download is legit, why cant you post the link?
motangNov 23rd 2010 11:08AM
I have to admit it IE 9 is shaping up well. I think MS finally get it.
Sebastian AnthonyNov 23rd 2010 12:15PM
@badr Because I'm terrified of Microsoft.
JoshNov 23rd 2010 12:24PM
@badr
Likely because it isn't official. Why risk MS legal knocking on your door over posting a link in an article?
Anthony S.Nov 23rd 2010 1:52PM
@badr He can't post the link because _*he*_ (and/or DLS) could be held responsible if something _did_ go wrong. It's a cover-your-ass type of thing.
Sebastian AnthonyNov 24th 2010 6:14AM
@Drakkenfyre I have no idea what you're talking about.
Sebastian AnthonyNov 24th 2010 6:14AM
@Drakkenfyre I have no idea what you're talking about...
Sebastian AnthonyNov 24th 2010 6:16AM
@(Unverified) Ugh, commenting system is slow.