The new Internet craze: splitting hairs over fractional Web browser market share changes

In recent months you may have noticed a surge of posts by popular, authoritative tech sites on the topic of Web browser market shares. They all take roughly the same format: a bold title about how one browser is losing ground, a graph with almost-straight lines that neither educates or enlightens, and to finish, an impossibly ludicrous prediction about what we can expect next month. This is not news.
In the last two years, there has only been one new browser: Google Chrome. Ready for the mindblowing bit? It is gaining market share! Hold on while I steady my shaking hands. I know what you're thinking: a new piece of software, created by one of the biggest and most important companies in the world -- why is it gaining market share?! WHAT IS THIS MADNESS?
In the last two years, there is only one definitive trend: Internet Explorer is losing market share and Chrome is gaining it. No combination of pretty pie charts or line graphs can support any other conclusion.
And therein lies the problem: every single source of Web browser statistics, and thus every graph, is different. In true tabloid, Fox Newsesque fashion, just pick a data set that suits your editorial style and roll with it -- who cares if it's news, who cares if it's accurate.
Fortunately, for those of us that still retain the most basic levels of critical analysis and cognitive sentience, this is the Internet! A wealth of information on the true state of the browser war -- and freedom from the dominion of hyperbolic, viral blogs -- is just a few clicks away.
We should begin, as always with Internet research, with the excellent Wiki resource on the Usage share of Web browsers. Not only does the Wiki page have up-to-the-month figures from every major Web analytics company, but you can also see comparative, side-by-side statistics.
According to W3Counter, Firefox has had a static (31%) market share for almost two and a half years. StatCounter and OneStat seem to agree, while others such as Net Applications and Stat Owl put Firefox's share nearer 20%.
Did you know that Firefox (13.5%) had a larger percentage market share after its first two years than Chrome (7.5%)? Even better, if you go back to when Internet Explorer first waged war against Netscape Navigator, it gained almost 40% of the market in just two years!
But other than very long, steady trends, I'm finding it hard to draw any conclusions because the data sets vary by such an incredible extent. The data, I am certain, comes from different parts of the Internet, and also from different parts of the world. Look at StatCounter Europe -- almost 40% use Firefox! I wonder what the browser share is like in Asia, where almost half of the Internet's population resides. I can't imagine there are many old or big corporations out there that are still stuck with Internet Explorer 6 -- there's probably a lot of Firefox and Chrome out there.
The worst thing, though, is that tech blogs are all but ignoring the most important statistic: the rate at which the Internet is growing. 200,000,000 new users connected between 2009 and 2010, so when Internet Explorer 'sits' at 60% (or 50% or 40%, depending on the graph), that means that this year alone around 100 million people installed IE8. Firefox, to keep its 30% (or 20%) share will have been installed by around 50 million new users. Chrome has certainly carved out a slice of the pie, but it's important to keep an eye on the bigger picture. Let's not forget that 270 million new smartphones will be sold around the world in 2010 -- I know Firefox and Opera have their eyes on that market, but what about Chrome and Internet Explorer?
As a parting thought, almost every one of those new Internet users come from the Middle East, Africa and Asia. I would love to see some browser market share statistics from Iran, India, Japan and big ol' China...















Comments
36
Subscribe to commentsstopsatgreenOct 5th 2010 1:20PM
Thank you for the most sensible article on this subject I've read in months - years, possibly.
StatCounter GSOct 5th 2010 1:29PM
"I would love to see some browser market share statistics from Iran, India, Japan and big ol' China..."
Well here you go Sebastian!
http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser-IR-monthly-200909-201009
http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser-IN-monthly-200909-201009
http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser-JP-monthly-200909-201009
We'd link to more, but we're limited to 3 URLs.
If you have any questions please get in touch.
Sebastian AnthonyOct 5th 2010 1:35PM
Hey!
I actually found those, while researching.
What kind of sample size is it from -- and do you know the demographics of the sample size?
I wonder if there are 'old' Japanese and Iranian people using IE6.
I would've thought that in 'new' markets, Firefox and Chrome would have much more representation... but I guess it depends on the version of Windows that they get bundled with, I guess.
StatCounter GSOct 5th 2010 1:49PM
Hi Seb,
We don't know the demographics as we have no way of tracking that.
The sample sizes are published here.
http://gs.statcounter.com/faq#sample-size
One of the most suprising stats from the emerging markets is China, with IE up near 90%.
http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser-CN-monthly-200909-201009
Sebastian AnthonyOct 5th 2010 1:57PM
Thanks.
Interesting how China has double the US's number of Internet users, but you only have one tenth of the hits... :) Makes you wonder where (location and demographic) those hits are coming from.
Most sites have fairly well-known demographics (via Alexa and other sites) -- it would be nice if you could go the next step and work out which demographics (and in which locales) use specific browsers!
DrekeOct 5th 2010 1:50PM
Why is no one talking about mobile market share?
Is it because a foreign (non-US) browser is the #1 mobile browser globally (Opera)?
GeorgeOct 5th 2010 7:29PM
It seems to me like iOS beats Opera. Opera is on the top of the charts because iPhone and iPod are split into two sections, but if they were summed up they would register higher than Opera.
RicardoOct 5th 2010 8:23PM
@George lol no.
Opera is a good 10% ahead of iOS, and "other" browsers dwarf the iOS share. Few people have an iPhone, maybe 1 in 100 mobile users. It's just that most of them don't browse on their phones, but this is changing very quickly. By 2012 it is expected that nearly 90% of mobile phones will be "smart" (with a decent browser). The good news for our fellow developers is that most of them will be using webkit too :)
http://gs.statcounter.com/#mobile_browser-ww-monthly-200909-201009
Daniel BloisOct 5th 2010 1:50PM
I read this website for Tech news and commentary - please leave your Political comments out of it. I do not want to see your liberal views or any conservative views. Political commentary has no place on this website - especially with your incorrect bias.
Sebastian AnthonyOct 5th 2010 1:57PM
What political commentary...?
Vineeth ReddyOct 5th 2010 2:06PM
I don't think the writer was being political, just offering an alternative view albeit with sarcasm and mockery :)
Daniel BloisOct 5th 2010 2:30PM
The Fox New comment. The rest of the article was fine but putting down Fox news is a political comment.
SilverWaveOct 5th 2010 3:12PM
@ Daniel Blois said 1:50PM on 10-05-2010
Blah blah blah fox news
I salute you sir!
Recognising your issues is the first step on the path to overcoming them.
Daniel BloisOct 5th 2010 3:15PM
You are saying I have issues because I do not want political commentory from a tech blog?
That makes sense.
SilverWaveOct 5th 2010 3:25PM
@ Sebastian Anthony said 1:57PM on 10-05-2010
heh... I had to reread what you had said and still couldn't see anything at first. The "Fox News style" remark is what it is... I don't think many people really think Fox is anything but old, Soviet style agitprop, do they?
In the UK its similar to remaking about the SUN tabloid. :-) Its not really a newspaper its got page 3, and a good sports section... also a bit of rabble rousing, scaremongering... I think I subconsciously categorised Fox as SUN TV... with out Page 3, no?
SilverWaveOct 5th 2010 3:29PM
@ Daniel Blois
>You are saying I have issues because I do not want political commentory from a tech blog?
>That makes sense.
Joking aside, the truth is that Fox has become a figure of fun because of its obvious bias and low standards. Its not a political dig, its just common usage.
Daniel BloisOct 5th 2010 3:30PM
Actually Silverwave,
you are wrong. It is the most popular Newstation in the U.S. and it is the least biased. I am not saying they are not biased - I am saying they are the LEAST biased of all the news agencies.
SilverWaveOct 5th 2010 3:34PM
@ Daniel Blois
Good one Daniel! I actual Laughed Out Loud...
No really!
Daniel BloisOct 5th 2010 3:42PM
Silverwave,
try checking the TV ratings - more people watch fox news than any other News Station in the US.
After that try watching Fox new and watching other news stations. Every other news station is liberal (which I gather you are from your comments) but Fox is Conservative. They are both biased toward their side. However, if you watch Fox news they show both sides of an argument (although they do spend more time on the conservative side - hence the bias). On the other hand, the other stations almost NEVER show the conservative side to an argument (hence more biased)
Try it some time.
Sebastian AnthonyOct 5th 2010 4:32PM
Hehe, I was just using a stereotype that I hoped many Americans could relate to. I'm British, and really have no idea about the whole Republican/Democratic Party thing. I can appreciate it's an important issue in the US, however!
Anyway, it's well known that Fox aims for popularity first and accuracy second -- I was simply alluding to the fact that some technology sites also use the same formula :)
I would strongly encourage people to seek out other news sources on the Internet, such as the BBC. That's one of the Internet's main strengths: you can choose what you watch, what you read and what you hear.
It's very, very dangerous to only receive one source of information.