Digital Economy Bill set to pass into UK law: watch out, hapless home owners!
The problems begin with the wording of the law: it's too loose. It has been written and argued by those that can't tell a bit from a byte. The new bill is so bloated and convoluted that it's almost impossible to judge where its caveats, clauses and consequences will lead us. Instead of chasing the pirates themselves, this law persecutes the householder -- the person that pays for the Internet connection must control what goes on. The best example is an open WiFi network: if someone logs into your open WiFi hub and downloads something illegal, you are the guilty one. Goodbye, wireless hotspots!
It's utterly crazy that Members of the UK Parliament should be discussing a law that they really have no clue about. As Tom Watson, Labour MP and the only out-spoken opposer of the new law, says: "The amendment seeks to address the legitimate concerns of rights-holders but would have unintended consequences which far outweigh any benefits it could bring [...] There are myriad legal, technical and practical issues to reconcile before this can be considered a proportionate and necessary public policy option. In some cases, these may never be reconciled. These issues have not even been considered in this case."
The British MPs must understand that policing the Internet is not a matter of passing draconian, police-state laws. That would be like damming the Atlantic Ocean. In fact, short of living in a totalitarian state, there has yet to be a successful example of curtailing undesirable behaviour on the Internet -- so why bother? Not only does this law attack the wrong cause -- how about providing legal movie downloads, studios? -- but this law will squander valuable police resources. Even worse, a lot of the burden created by the Digital Economy Bill will be shouldered by ISPs themselves! Ugh.
When will politicians realize that humans are not, by default, bad people? We're not born into piracy; there just isn't any other way to quickly, easily and cheaply obtain what we want.













Comments
9
Subscribe to commentsWill NeaversonApr 8th 2010 9:17AM
Couldn't have said it better. An excellent article. Whilst not a supporter of piracy, I believe this could be handled better by people who know what they're passing. Such a shame.
JasonApr 8th 2010 9:58AM
Good luck enforcing it in China. Idiots.
Marc StuApr 8th 2010 11:22AM
Pretty much sums it up: http://davidwilkinson.tumblr.com/post/504306582/where-the-digital-economy-bill-goes-wrong
As it turns out, the bill is not only impractical, but also illegal. At least, if the UK considers the Magna Carta & The European Court Of Human Rights to have any weight in the matter (both being legally binding in Britain).
Sebastian AnthonyApr 8th 2010 11:25AM
Many bonus points for citing the Magna Carta :)
Crazy SerbApr 8th 2010 12:19PM
Come on now, this is only one of the first steps towards absolute draconian state... first few were all the surveillance cameras, then that anti-terrorist measure of not allowing pictures to be taken and searching those who do...
The problem is not the people making these into laws (as they are easily bought out and bribed by the people who'd like to see these things become laws)... the real problem is 60 Million people living in UK that allow these few hundred old farts with no brains to dictate their lives, control how they go about their daily business and what they can and cannot do.
60 Million lazy people who really don't give a shit what the small minority decides to impose upon them... if only a percentage of those people actually cared about this, a single 1% of the population, and went out of their way and did something (complained, written emails/mails, protested, boycotted, whatever) this would've never made it through... But hey, sheeple can't be bothered - they have rent to pay, jobs to attend...
OliApr 8th 2010 3:37PM
I think that's quite unfair
The attention this got was really quite large, enough to take it to the #2 top trending topic on Twitter, and with lots of people taking action and discussing it. Generations of people who were never into politics before took interest here. Thousands of letters sent to MPs, thousands of people trying to make a difference.
The problem? It makes no difference at all. The whips ensure all the Labour and Conservative MPs have to vote yes (3 line whip). At this point, there's nothing the people can do.
The majority of MPs didn't read the bill or care, they do what they were told by the whip. Some were good enough to speak of the opposition and complaints they'd had at the debate - but the debate was a farce, with about 30 MPs at the debate. After the debate, another 200 or so turned up, were told to vote yes by the whip, and went and did so.
There's nothing debating nor people in their constituencies could do.
Because they did it as the government is dieing, therei sn't even any real choice of rebeling. As it was all done so fast and pushed through at last minute, there wasn't even much chance to take more action than was done.
What more could people have done?
Crazy SerbApr 8th 2010 4:30PM
What more could people have done? Umm, let's see... elsewhere on planet Earth these days this is what people do when they are being taken as fools for too long/too far:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/apr/07/kyrgyzstan-protests-17-killed
http://www.euronews.net/newswires/209879-thai-red-shirts-vow-to-step-up-bangkok-protest/
Just saying... just saying.
If the people you write to won't listen (because they've been bribed/told to ignore the populus), you take them out... or they will take you out, one way or another.
AnthonyApr 8th 2010 7:42PM
Kinda reminds me of what they did here in the US with the healthcare "reform" bill. They passed a 3500 page bill and signed it into law without even knowing what it contains. Now, they're saying we'll just have to see what's in it. What is happening to our world?
asianxredneckApr 9th 2010 5:51AM
http://www.eff.org/issues/acta