Add your comments
DLS Archives
May 2012
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
Essential Windows Apps | Do Not Track | Microsoft Office | SayNow | LibreOffice | Zeam Android Launcher | Dead Space iPhone | Firefox 4 Mobile | Firefox 4 Release | PlayStation iPhone App | Excel Tips | Android Launcher | Google One Pass | Dead Space | Google Cloud Print | Songbird for Android | NBA Jam | Internet Explorer 9 | Windows 7 Connector for Mac | Office Mac 2011 | IE9 RC
Gadget News
- LG launches new pair of TVs: DM2752 and M2752 can both double-up as your PC monitor
- Sharp Pantone 5 ICS phone has 8 color choices, 3.7-inch screen -- oh, and a radiation detector
- AGA's iTotal Control range cooker packs GSM connectivity, lets you pre-heat via SMS or web
- Futulele goes live for iPad, ukelele serenades just went multi-touch (video)






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
(Unverified)Feb 17th 2010 11:11AM
If security and privacy of data is a concern, and it should be, companies of all sizes should familiarize themselves with Next Generation Backup. If you run a few servers I assume you are virtualized already. Online services have a big bottleneck wen backing up increasing numbers of VM's
If you add a need for replication to the equation, then the case for backup to disk is more compelling.
If you add data deduplication on top of that, it is actually easy to prove that TCO is lower, complexity is less and automation is easier when you use a Next Generation Backup approach.