Hot on HuffPost Tech:

See More Stories
Free Switched iPhone app - try it now!
AOL Tech

Unscientific text entry speed testing reveals surprising results

Text Input speed testingI have a lot of friends that own both a Blackberry and an iPod Touch. When I ask them why they didn't just get an iPhone, I often hear that they "need a real keyboard". I have to admit that when I started with my iPhone, I wasn't sold on the idea of a soft-keyboard (one that exists only in software through the touchscreen), but it took only a short time to be convinced. I feel reasonably fast when typing on my phone now, which is something that I can't say about my years using a Windows-Mobile based PDA.

In fact, if I was to venture a guess, I'd say that I'm as fast typing on my phone as I am writing. It's a revelation to me to be able to take notes digitally at the same speed as I used to be able to write them.

Phil Gyford was even more curious than me about input speed, so he set himself up a test between handwriting, an Apple Newton MessagePad, a Palm Vx, a Palm Treo, an iPhone, and a laptop, using each's primary input method:

  • Pen and paper
  • The Apple Newton MessagePad 2100's handwriting recognition (1997)
  • The Palm Vx's Graffiti (1999)
  • The Palm Treo 650's hardware QWERTY keyboard (2004)
  • The Apple iPhone 3G's software QWERTY keyboard (2009)
  • A full-size QWERTY laptop keyboard

I'm particularly interested in the comparison between handwriting recognition and the iPhone's software keyboard. The results (scroll down!) might surprise you, as they did me. Do they match up with your experiences?

Share

Tags: apple iphone, apple newton, AppleIphone, AppleNewton, blackberry, graffiti, handwriting recognition, HandwritingRecognition, input method, InputMethod, iphone, ipod touch, IpodTouch, keyboard, newton messagepad, NewtonMessagepad, palm, palm treo, palm vx, PalmTreo, PalmVx, pen and paper, PenAndPaper, phil gyford, PhilGyford, software keyboard, SoftwareKeyboard, touchscreen

Comments

3