Facebook and Google set up short URL services, competitors rush out to buy new pants

You see, Facebook and Google have announced that they are joining forces to form the Separatist Alliance and destroy the Republic once and for all. Ok, so they're just going to offer their own short URL services, but the bottom line is that when the world's largest social networking site and Google offer a product like this, it's no longer business as usual for everyone else.
The convenience of sharing URLs using built-in options on Facebook or within your Google toolbar (and Feedburner) will win over plenty of users.
Google's official post says their service isn't a standalone offering - at least for now. They could very well decide to open the floodgates later and tie this into other Google products like Chrome and Chrome OS. Hey, why not?
Facebook's fb.me service will allow you to shorten any link on the site - even if you just want to trim down the path to a specific profile page (http://fb.me/YourProfile). No mention of whether or not they plan on providing an API for third-party developers to integrate the service. Share












Comments
6
Subscribe to commentschrisDec 14th 2009 4:55PM
This would take all of about one hour of coding to implement, so I'm surprised that google didn't do this years ago.
JamesDec 15th 2009 12:33AM
Updated saying should be "1% perspiration, 99% building critical mass". At least Google has done it a bunch before...
Dave ForsterDec 15th 2009 10:27AM
they'd be even shorter if they didn't insist on putting the http:// in the result !
digs.by/10Wd is the same as http://digs.by/10Wd
imagine all the additional
Dave ForsterDec 15th 2009 10:28AM
... all the additional blah blah blah
(last bit wasn't important anyway)
Heaven'sHellslayerDec 15th 2009 11:57AM
Where is the outcry? Google is taking over the world and everyone doesn't care! I am leaving...going to bash wal mart some more! o.0
Money MikeDec 17th 2009 2:15PM
I just tried "fb.me/xxx" with xxx being my profile name and it worked just fine. Why would anyone need the "http://" part?