Google green-lights extension which clearly violates its own policies

In their program policies for the Extensions Gallery, Google states "We don't allow products or services that violate third party terms of service, or products or services that enable the unauthorized download of streaming content or media."
One has to wonder what they were thinking when they approved the YouTube Downloader extension. In addition to breaching the developer terms of service, it's also in violation of the YouTube TOS:
Now, unless YouTube Downloader has some massive archive of written letters from the clip uploaders themselves, I think it's pretty clear that this extension does things Google claims it isn't going to tolerate.Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only and may not be downloaded, copied, modified, produced, reproduced, distributed, transmitted, broadcast, displayed, sold, licensed, translated, published, performed or otherwise exploited for any other purposes whatsoever without the prior written consent of the respective owners.Accessing User Videos for any purpose or in any manner other than Streaming is expressly prohibited.
Further along, it states:
It will be interesting to see what the next step is -- I wouldn't be at all surprised if the extension gets pulled in the very near future. If they want to keep major content providers happy, they don't have a choice: they must pull it now. Google can't afford to appear permissive when it comes to violating content-protection provisions. It would seem like a crazy move while hardly a day goes by without news of Google courting yet another big deal with a large-scale media publisher.
update: the extension's page now displays an error. It would appear as though the banhammer has fallen.












Comments
23
Subscribe to commentsJay GilmoreDec 14th 2009 9:16AM
I agree with that point and have no argument there but the basis of the post and the argument posed was based on the quote I cited. Under those terms it is in fact a TOS violation.
Lee MathewsDec 14th 2009 9:16AM
In hindsight, yeah, I should've been more awake when choosing the YT TOS snippet...but I based my post on the Gallery TOS, not Youtube's, and there's no question it violates that. :)
gameplace123Jun 8th 2010 1:57AM
uh-oh... now comes the inconsistencies that everyone loved to hate Apple's App Store for. Google, I thought you were better than that...