Major publishers collaborating on "Hulu for magazines"
Major magazine publishers know they're in trouble. Mags have been shutting down all over the place during the past year, and the rise of blogs and eReaders continues apace. A group of publishers including Conde Nast, Hearst, Meredith, News Corp., and Time Inc. has combined to launch a digital delivery system for magazines that has been compared to both iTunes and the popular streaming TV site Hulu. The service has no name yet, but it will deliver magazines - and advertising, of course - to eReaders, mobile devices and laptops, staying true to the mags' print layouts. Other publishers will be able to join the platform eventually (hey, it can't hurt to offer more content), and it might expand beyond magazines eventually.
As Valleywag points out, the challenge of this venture is to consolidate the userbase behind one device and corresponding delivery mechanism, like Apple did with iTunes and the iPod. Magazine publishers might not be the ones to do that, considering how clueless they've been in the print business. Plus, Hearst is also involved in a service called Skiff, that launched a week ago, uses Sprint's 3G network, and seems to be a competitor with this nameless new magazine platform.
[via Mashable]












Comments
3
Subscribe to commentsBruceDec 8th 2009 4:25PM
I bet Apple is waiting for this kind of infrastructure to be set up before it releases its tablet.
Once the world starts reading magazines online in big numbers, a greater need for the tablet will develop.
PeterDec 8th 2009 6:48PM
@Bruce - Yeah, yeah, tablets have been waiting for the killer app for years and they still haven't caught on.
Have you ever used a slate tablet? The form factor sucks. Even just writing emails on a tablet is cumbersome without a keyboard. Outside of niche vertical markets where the required input is tightly controlled, tablets just don't make sense.
KamalDec 8th 2009 11:59PM
If it's not free, it's not like Hulu. At least, until Hulu starts charging.