Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

(Unverified)Nov 20th 2009 9:24PM

Neutral

dont understand all that winamp hate,

i use winamp (the latest version), i just install the plugins i really need (so no visualizations, no modern themes, no bloat), and it has all the functions of foobar, runs faster (starting up and playing and cpu usage), spends less memory (around 2megs while playing, plain foobar without anything spends around 8megs while playing), and actually sounds better (but that's maybe cause i tweaked winamp sound settings to my liking),

so good old winamp is at least for now and for me a much superior player than foobar, hell foobar is only really good when you install a bunch of themes and plugins and that just makes it incredibly "itunes like" bloated, so i dont think there is any comparison... the only real downside is that the original developer is no longer working on it ^T_T

Dislike

Report

Add your comments

Your comments:

Remember me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.