Add your comments
DLS Archives
May 2013
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
Essential Windows Apps | Do Not Track | Microsoft Office | SayNow | LibreOffice | Zeam Android Launcher | Dead Space iPhone | Firefox 4 Mobile | Firefox 4 Release | PlayStation iPhone App | Excel Tips | Android Launcher | Google One Pass | Dead Space | Google Cloud Print | Songbird for Android | NBA Jam | Internet Explorer 9 | Windows 7 Connector for Mac | Office Mac 2011 | IE9 RC






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
(Unverified)Nov 12th 2009 4:23AM
So we're just going to keep quiet about the fact that it's exactly the same kind of integration that MS was so greatly criticised for with IE and Windows?
MySchizoBuddyNov 12th 2009 4:53AM
If MS wasn't a monopoly the integration between IE and Windows wasn't a problem. MS was using its monopoly in Windows to create another monopoly in IE. Thats abusing your monopoly and thats why MS was sued.
Any other company that isn't a monopoly and does this sort of integration will not be sued. Laws against a monopoly are different
(Unverified)Nov 12th 2009 4:55AM
I was more referring to the security implications...
(Unverified)Nov 12th 2009 6:48AM
Oh totally... the security implications... :P
But no, you're right, we probably are just looking at the new Microsoft.
Utilising the goodwill power of OS to take over the world...!