Add your comments
DLS Archives
May 2013
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
Essential Windows Apps | Do Not Track | Microsoft Office | SayNow | LibreOffice | Zeam Android Launcher | Dead Space iPhone | Firefox 4 Mobile | Firefox 4 Release | PlayStation iPhone App | Excel Tips | Android Launcher | Google One Pass | Dead Space | Google Cloud Print | Songbird for Android | NBA Jam | Internet Explorer 9 | Windows 7 Connector for Mac | Office Mac 2011 | IE9 RC
Gadget News
- Google's Field Trip app granting free admission to 13 museums
- KDDI's HTC J One variant packs a microSD slot, additional camera features (video)
- Sony Xperia UL announced for Japan: 5-inch 1080p display and 15-frame burst photography skills (video)
- Nook Simple Touch reportedly getting web browser, email client on June 1st






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
(Unverified)Oct 6th 2009 10:35AM
I don't get the hate. Who cares if they can't enforce it properly, it's a good rule. If they give you something for free to review, that should be mentioned in the review.
vicagredaOct 6th 2009 10:42AM
But what does that mean? If I get promo codes for 50 fart apps, then delete them, do I need to disclose that entire process? Do I need to come back a year later and say, "oh, I'm not using them any more" or, "I wound up buying this because it is awesome!"
No, I think it should be a policy of publishers and it should be enforceable via the people who MAKE stuff. What you want to avoid is a software publisher sending copies to people just for the sake of good reviews, right? Well, don't waste time tracking down 100 bloggers when you could nab the publisher, you know? This just seems backwards, really, from a culpability standpoint.
Like, try busting the dealer instead of the addict.