iTunes 9 continues to suck on Windows, makes halfhearted attempt at Windows 7 integration

I make no bones about the fact that I'm not an iTunes fan. With Apple's usual trumpeting of a new release of version 9, I was hopeful that things might be different this time around.
Really, we all know better. Apple apps on the Windows platform are kind of like that Christmas present in the fancy wrapping that turns out to be a pair of work socks or plain white briefs.
So off I went to download yet another 80+ megabytes of upgrade. You know, because Apple also hasn't figured out how to do modest, intelligent updates (a la Google Chrome or a dozen other apps). After I'd given up 110 megs of disk space to iTunes 9, here's what I was rewarded with on my Windows 7 laptop.
Jumplist: the Windows default options are there, i.e. songs can be pinned to open in iTunes, but that's thanks to Windows 7. What did Apple themselves integrate? Two links to the iTunes store so we can more easily spend money on fart apps and soundboards. No recently played items, no playlists, nada.
Taskbar preview: Album artwork? Nope. Progress indicator? Nope. Previous, Play/Pause, and Next buttons and a balloon with the current track's title, artist, and album name.
This is the best Apple can do? It's not even close to as slick as what this independent developer knocked together for Foobar2000. Feel free to share your take on iTunes 9 for Windows in the comments.
Really, we all know better. Apple apps on the Windows platform are kind of like that Christmas present in the fancy wrapping that turns out to be a pair of work socks or plain white briefs.
So off I went to download yet another 80+ megabytes of upgrade. You know, because Apple also hasn't figured out how to do modest, intelligent updates (a la Google Chrome or a dozen other apps). After I'd given up 110 megs of disk space to iTunes 9, here's what I was rewarded with on my Windows 7 laptop.
Jumplist: the Windows default options are there, i.e. songs can be pinned to open in iTunes, but that's thanks to Windows 7. What did Apple themselves integrate? Two links to the iTunes store so we can more easily spend money on fart apps and soundboards. No recently played items, no playlists, nada.
Taskbar preview: Album artwork? Nope. Progress indicator? Nope. Previous, Play/Pause, and Next buttons and a balloon with the current track's title, artist, and album name.
This is the best Apple can do? It's not even close to as slick as what this independent developer knocked together for Foobar2000. Feel free to share your take on iTunes 9 for Windows in the comments.












Comments
40
Subscribe to commentsSam JordanSep 12th 2009 3:55PM
Ugh, iTunes has sucked and continues to suck on all Windows OS'. It's simply not a good program. I'd drop all the bullshit 'Genius' features if Apple will make a native iTunes, like they did for Safari.
I'm *praying* that they do ti for version 10, but Apple frankly doesn't give a shit.
MacBookOwnerSep 12th 2009 4:34PM
Wow, iTunes 9 makes a halfhearted attempt at Windows 7 integration, before Windows 7 is released? STOP THE PRESSES.
JoshSep 12th 2009 4:48PM
It's a real shame that Apple couldn't program for Windows like they do for OS X. iTunes on OS X is absolutely wonderful. It's not slow, it never freezes, it doesn't crash. If Apple would recode it from the ground up for Windows (won't happen), it could be the definitive music player for Windows (if you can deal without the customization abilities of Foobar, that is). That said, I couldn't imagine using it full time if I were a Windows user.
Of course, the same can be said about Microsoft. Office on Mac is absolute crap and you're better off using two cans and some string over Messenger.
Christina WarrenSep 12th 2009 6:14PM
Exactly. I hated iTunes on Windows and only had it installed for certain tasks (or for buying music) and used Foobar for everything else.
But on the Mac, it's so much faster and nicer to interface with, we don't even have many music player alternatives -- not because there aren't plenty of developers, but because it would sort of be pointless. Like, why recreate the wheel.
Having said that, the fact that they do and support Windows at all is something that probably makes many people deep inside Apple cringe over. I mean, it's supported because it's the biggest operating system. I'm sure they don't like having to work with the Windows APIs while maintaining UI consistencies with their own OS.
I would rather use iTunes in Windows over Entourage in Mac. But as you said, that isn't saying much.
Toby AdamsSep 12th 2009 5:26PM
iTunes on Windows is worse than an Adobe Air app! Nasty stuff.
Matt S.Sep 12th 2009 7:08PM
I don't understand why you are talking about Windows 7 like its some beta OS. Its finished and its been finished for a few months. I would be disappointed if Apple didn't put at least some effort into adding Window 7 features into iTunes. Now the lack of effort into those features are pretty much expected too. The fact that Windows 7 isn't for sale yet has nothing to do with whether Apple should be adding features to iTunes for it. All developers should update their products for new OSs before the OS is released.
As for iTunes 9, I was quite surprised actually. It is the fastest ive seen itunes yet. The store is pretty fast and my biggest gripe about itunes before now was that it took forever to go from inactive to active when you click off itunes and back again it was slower than malasses.. But, that to is acceptable now. Its finally not a chore to use anymore. And I dont have a highend pc either.. Its a 5 year old Celeron with 2GB on Vista SP2. While I have Windows 7 RTM on my laptop I haven't yet installed itunes 9 on it yet. Hopefully my experiences with version 9 on vista will be recipricated on Win 7 as well..
Matt S.Sep 12th 2009 9:22PM
I almost forgot, Christina Warren brought up the fact that they even take the time to make a Windows app..
Can anyone imagine the hit Apple would take on their iTunes Store revenue if Apple didn't make a Windows version of iTunes. I'm pretty sure most of the revenue they get is from Windows users if you take into account the majority of iPod users use PCs.
patrickanthonyolsonSep 12th 2009 7:56PM
Itunes not properly integrated into Windows 7!?
Isn't that a good thing? considering its not properly done on existing Windows platform. I mean other than uploading music to your device, I can't imagine anyone actually using for, gasp, playing music...
Whith so many choices and much better players out there for Windows who would even care about Itunes. IE: Winamp, Songbird, Musicmonkey and hey even WMP has made some significant advances in Win7.
I have Itunes installed on a old pc, so I can avoid having multiple processes installed and peace of mind I don't have Apple messing around with my system.
Where all getting Zune HD's anyway right? :-P
DuckSep 12th 2009 8:30PM
I'm an iTunes fan and that looks pretty poor.
Mind you, Windows 7 isn't officially out yet, so hopefully Apple will make it a bit better before Windows 7 is released...
GeorgeSep 12th 2009 10:42PM
Actually, the whole 'Windows 7 isn't even released yet' is a bogus and invalid argument. RC1 has been available to the general public for months now. Developers and MSDN/TECHNET subscribers have had access for much longer. Apple has had access at least as long as I have. There is no excuse for them not to try a bit more. They could, at the very least, make it work better under Vista. iTunes is a pig and the latest release is no different. It is ugly and about as graceful as a bull in a china shop. Windows users are Apple's biggest customers, they should make their software work better. I don't give a rats butt Mac OS X. There are way iTunes users on Windows than Mac OS X and that should be the priority for iTunes devlopment, not the other way around. For a company that is supposed to be so concerned about the 'user experience', they sure do ignore the largest group of users they have.
blaxislittleSep 13th 2009 3:04AM
itunes like a shiny car with nice view but doesnt have engine for pc only mac verison have this .. stupid apple.i don't wanna buy a mac for entire my life
price is so high.. come on.. ipod.. iphone or mac.. stupid prices out there and every stupid gonna buyin them..
quantaSep 13th 2009 4:21PM
I thought this was an excellent article - not specifically because it highlights the Windows 7 jumplist issue, but it demonstrates a general callousness in Apple development when it comes to features that do not directly benefit their bottom line.
Another great example is the half-hearted automatic folder watching feature - it only works if you manually move all your music not purchased from iTunes into one particular pre-defined folder buried deep in your iTunes library.
I feel iTunes development seems to have stagnated somewhere around iTunes 5 in the same way Microsoft Windows Media Player and other media products seem to be advancing in version #s yet don't seem to bring many game-changing features to the table any longer.
I agree, yes, jumplists for a competitor's OS and watch folders don't push more iTunes store purchases. It may even make good business sense to do this w.r.t. resource allocation, but it often feels like too much mercenariness rather than genuine dedication is being put into the product.
MattSep 14th 2009 1:21AM
That's still more integration than I've seen in 99% of applications. The taskbar preview is the same as the one for Windows Media Player.
Michael WendellSep 14th 2009 9:46AM
The only reason this POS is installed on my PC is because I have an iPhone and don't have a choice.
We need a piece of software that can 1) move audio & video to (and from) the phone, 2) back the phone up completely, and 3) perform system updates, 4) never ever destructively sync anything, 5) run without a laborious install.
I'd pay $100 for that right now if it worked well.
JonSep 14th 2009 1:09PM
Yet another reason to continue running iTunes-free. Once I found an alternate way to get music on my old iPod I uninstalled iTunes have haven't looked back since. Of course, I haven't even turned on my iPod in a year or so.
I agree with quanta. The point of the post does not seem to be that Apple isn't fully supporting an "unreleased" OS (an argument already debunked by others), but rather Apple's general "screw you" attitude towards its supposedly loyal and definitely paying customers.
MedlirSep 14th 2009 9:36PM
I wish there was a functional alternative to iTunes. doubleTwist was great for just putting music on until it ceased to work with 3.0. I don't even care about Windows 7 integration, though it's what I use at both work and home. I wish more basic things were handled... like when you remove Bonjour, and it pops up it's warning message about it *behind* all other open apps with no taskbar button for the dialog, so you don't even know it's back there. Or how the GEAR ASPI filter driver it installs breaks so many systems rendering their optical drives non-functional. Or how there's no Stop button, Pause does not replace Stop. Or the options for inserting a CD... how about an option to DO NOTHING when you insert a CD. Or if using an USB extension cable and charging your ipod, if iTunesHelper detects an iPod but can't connect to it to check the setting for whether it should run iTunes or not... it runs iTunes anyway... and once it runs, it tells you it can't connect to it... well duh, if it couldn't connect to it to check the setting that says NOT to run iTunes when it's plugged in, why would I want it to run anyway to tell me it can't connect?! How about settings to Ignore the warnings about Bonjour/GEAR... iTunes and the iPod work fine without them... how come I can't say I know they aren't there, and to quit looking for them and telling me EVERY SINGLE TIME. Or installing apps... why can't I drag and drop individual apps from the Library to my iPod?! Why do I HAVE to sync all apps to get a single app on there?! Or how about if you have download window open, how it sucks down almost 50% of a 2.2GHz CPU while the download window is open, and then fine once you change to a view that doesn't show the progress bar?! That's horrible.
So yeah, I'd rather they fix the numerous other horrible usability issues before they worry about 7 integration.
RobSep 14th 2009 8:54PM
http://www.mgtek.com/dopisp/ allows you to use WMP for syncing iPods and Iphones/Touches prior to OS 3, which broke its support, although that's coming back. It allows you to sync music OFF of your iPod, which would be in and of itself enough to justify its existence. If you have Windows and an iPod, it's worth a try!
Michael WendellSep 14th 2009 10:40PM
This is great for music, but the iPhone needs something that also backs up contacts, mail, settings, etc. Nothing like that exists right now.
JohnSep 17th 2009 9:26AM
apparently you all are luck or I am not! I installed itunes 9 and it won't even open now. After clicking on itunes I simply get the.... itunes has encountered a problem and needs to close. I have uninstalled and reinstalled with no improvement. And I am running windows xp
roadstomadnessOct 26th 2009 6:21PM
I installed itunes 9 on my laptop running windows 7 - trend micro gave me a low risk warning - Details: Display Name GEAR ASPI Filter Driver
Program:c:\Windows\system32\DRIVERS\GEARAspiWDM.sys
should I allow this or not?
Thank you.