Tr.im goes community-owned, takes shot at Bit.ly
The drama around URL shorteners doesn't appear to be ending any time soon. Here's a quick recap, for those who haven't been following:
In his blog post announcing the community-owned model, Woodward criticizes the 301works group as a Bit.ly publicity stunt that will be ineffective in solving the dead link problem. He's quite clear that Tr.im will not be joining 301works, and that community ownership is a better way to preserve links in the future.
- Tr.im, the fourth most popular URL shortening service, shut down because of the insurmountable advantage its competitor, Bit.ly, gets as a result of being the default URL shrinker on Twitter.
- A couple of days later, Tr.im was back, still angry about the perceived Bit.ly monopoly, but ready to continue operations or sell to someone who would.
- According to Tr.im, Bit.ly offered Tr.im $10,000 for its domain name and all of its links. Tr.im said no to this and other reported offers.
- Meanwhile, Bit.ly joined a coalition of similar services, called 301works, to create an archive of shortlinks, in case a shutdown like Tr.im's should happen again in the future.
In his blog post announcing the community-owned model, Woodward criticizes the 301works group as a Bit.ly publicity stunt that will be ineffective in solving the dead link problem. He's quite clear that Tr.im will not be joining 301works, and that community ownership is a better way to preserve links in the future.













Comments
3
Subscribe to commentsmotangAug 17th 2009 7:39PM
Tr.im needs to stop being a baby!
joemAug 17th 2009 10:18PM
Personally, I find all this amusing. I have never needed a URL shortener, and can not foresee ever needing one.
sodapopAug 18th 2009 3:51PM
Twitter is to blame here. They should allow basic HTML links and not count the HTML nor URL to the char. limit. It's Twitter's social responsibility to maintain the data they collect.
I made my own URL shortner because I pretty much convinced I'll keep that domain for the rest of my life. (And I have a directory of all the links)
But what are short URLs anyway? Are they really worth saving? Most links are to more permanent sources. The source is more important. While short links could measure popularity, most of the short links made are for temporary purposes. Twitter, specifically, is a notification system limited to real time SOV. At max value, some Twitter accounts are only valid as a custom/personalized index to other parts of the internet.