Add your comments
DLS Archives
May 2013
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
Essential Windows Apps | Do Not Track | Microsoft Office | SayNow | LibreOffice | Zeam Android Launcher | Dead Space iPhone | Firefox 4 Mobile | Firefox 4 Release | PlayStation iPhone App | Excel Tips | Android Launcher | Google One Pass | Dead Space | Google Cloud Print | Songbird for Android | NBA Jam | Internet Explorer 9 | Windows 7 Connector for Mac | Office Mac 2011 | IE9 RC
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Sax25Aug 7th 2009 10:53PM
The problem with this service is that in the bottom lower corner - they have 6 pics of examples and ask you to hover over them to see the before and after. Well 3 of the pics have red eye - but if you look at the red in the eye, it is obviously and manually placed there given the fact that the red eye in every pic looks identical. If this service is so good at claiming to fix images, then why don't they use naturally taken photos from digicams that have genuine red eye? It would help to sell the service more.
If in the before picture they have added fake red eye spots and in the after picture it has been removed - well duh, of course its gone, given that it was added (photoshop layer) so its not hard to remove it for the "after" picture. So in actual fact - it doesn't show the software doing its job which just makes it a complete fail.
(Unverified)Aug 8th 2009 7:04AM
Actually, it does remove the red eyes. Take a PrtScr of said picture and use the service and see how it looks exactly as the "After" picture. No layering or photoshop was used.