Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

sonicyoofApr 17th 2009 4:14AM

Neutral

How about not allowing it on the grounds of "objectification of women"? Viewing a human being as an object is probably worse than any "indecency" reason.

Plus, the app is rediculous and stupid. Some fat 50 year old guy can move his finger and, woops, there goes the clothes... kinda? And, hey, what's this? I can move my finger up and down and make the clothes go back and forth. Nifty!

They should also reject the app for pointlessness.

Dislike

Report

(Unverified)May 3rd 2009 3:15PM

Neutral

Bill if it was pictures of guys would you like it better???

You dumb intellectual -- you probably object to Maxim, Playboy and other disgusting magazines that show gorgeous sexy women.

No relation to Mel Gibson of course....Just stay in the closet and let others be

Dislike

Report

Add your comments

Your comments:

Remember me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.