Add your comments
DLS Archives
May 2012
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
Essential Windows Apps | Do Not Track | Microsoft Office | SayNow | LibreOffice | Zeam Android Launcher | Dead Space iPhone | Firefox 4 Mobile | Firefox 4 Release | PlayStation iPhone App | Excel Tips | Android Launcher | Google One Pass | Dead Space | Google Cloud Print | Songbird for Android | NBA Jam | Internet Explorer 9 | Windows 7 Connector for Mac | Office Mac 2011 | IE9 RC






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
bigsoftyMar 26th 2009 8:07AM
Yeah XP is rubbish, is run faster than Vista, has less bugs, runs lean on hardware for netbooks...
Vista was an experiment that failed, thats why Win 7 is being rushed out and you paid for it, ROFL.
Time to get your cash out boys daddy MS needs a new feed... :D
DanrarbcMar 26th 2009 1:43PM
1) How can you even measure something like bugs? If you compare what needed fixed in patches, XP required FAR more patching in it's first two years than Vista (hint: that means Vista was less buggy).
2) If you were paying attention three years ago you'd know 'Vienna' was always on the roadmap for a 2009 release. Take one guess as to what Vienna's new name is. Oh look, they didn't rush anything, especially not in response to Vista. And if Vista was such a failed experiment why is so much of it still prevalent in 7?