Prepare yourself for bigger, harder to miss web advertising
A huge number of web site publishers make most of their money from advertising. That's true of this site, and it's true of the 27 major web publishers that have come together in an effort to find some form of advertising that's more effective than the old fashioned banner ads that populate many web sites today.
The 27 publishers are part of the Online Publishers Association, and they've each agreed to try at least one of three new units before July. The units are a 336 pixel by 860 pixel ad that scrolls up and down the page, a wider 468 pixel y 648 pixel box with page turning and video features, and a Pushdown box (pictured above0 that is 970 pixels wide by 418 pixels tall and which can be minimized.
In other words, all three ad units take up a ton of screen real estate. But that doesn't have to be a bad thing for readers. If you look at most web sites today, you'll notice a fair amount of space is dedicated to advertising. It's just that you typically see ads from many different companies. If these new ad units wind up being more effective at grabbing your attention, advertisers might be willing to pay significantly higher prices, which means that while the future could be filled with enormous ads on web pages, you won't find nearly as many ads on each page.
Or the whole experiment could end in failure. Download Squad publisher AOL isn't currently involved in the experiment, but the 27 participating companies have a combined reach of over 100-million page views a month. So odds are you'll see one of the new ad units soon enough.
[via Techmeme
The 27 publishers are part of the Online Publishers Association, and they've each agreed to try at least one of three new units before July. The units are a 336 pixel by 860 pixel ad that scrolls up and down the page, a wider 468 pixel y 648 pixel box with page turning and video features, and a Pushdown box (pictured above0 that is 970 pixels wide by 418 pixels tall and which can be minimized.
In other words, all three ad units take up a ton of screen real estate. But that doesn't have to be a bad thing for readers. If you look at most web sites today, you'll notice a fair amount of space is dedicated to advertising. It's just that you typically see ads from many different companies. If these new ad units wind up being more effective at grabbing your attention, advertisers might be willing to pay significantly higher prices, which means that while the future could be filled with enormous ads on web pages, you won't find nearly as many ads on each page.
Or the whole experiment could end in failure. Download Squad publisher AOL isn't currently involved in the experiment, but the 27 participating companies have a combined reach of over 100-million page views a month. So odds are you'll see one of the new ad units soon enough.
[via Techmeme













Comments
15
Subscribe to commentsEminemdrdre00Mar 10th 2009 2:20PM
Ads? Adblock FTW!
za7ch84Mar 10th 2009 2:27PM
Yep. Works like a charm.
daniel freeMar 10th 2009 2:27PM
damn, now im gonna end up with big empty spaces at the top instead of discrete empty spaces down the side >
Trent OMar 10th 2009 3:06PM
RIP, Remove It Permanently, best firefox addon solution for gettin' rid of the gaps adblock plus leaves.
JonMar 10th 2009 2:28PM
ESPN is getting silly .. 99% of the page is ads
you actually have to scroll down to read a headline
JamusMar 10th 2009 2:32PM
I do not mind small unobtrusive ads (no sounds, jumpy images, flashing symbols, video, etc...), but if annoying ads show up, they are quickly blocked.
TonyMar 10th 2009 3:23PM
CNN had those apple ad's it was so bad i could not read the CNN headline story it just turned me away .. I wont watch them so please don't fill up my screen the only think i look for is the X to close them
DavidMar 10th 2009 2:50PM
"That's ture of this site"
typo?
TonyMar 10th 2009 2:52PM
CNN had those apple ad's it was so bad i could not read the CNN headline story it just turned me away .. I wont watch them so please don't fill up my screen the only think i look for is the X to close them
BrianMar 10th 2009 3:47PM
When the ESPN ads get dynamic (like the current iPod touch ad that is running) they more often than not break the functionality of the page for me. I'm often unable to minimize them even given the option, they stay enlarged. If I had a viable alternative (ESPN still does what it does best) it would drive me away from the site.
EddieMar 13th 2009 1:38PM
Uh, that iPod ad was horrible. I couldn't minimize it or select any of the ESPN links just above. I have to say I've never NOT wanted to buy an iPod so much.
Kenn.keeperMar 10th 2009 5:03PM
YARIP ( Yes Another Remove It Permanently) Firefox add-on also works very well, even better than RIP. Will give you more options so you don't completely mess up the page for future viewing...
EthanMar 10th 2009 10:30PM
If I could subscribe to an adless blogsmith I would, as it is I just use adblock unfortunately.
RususeruruMar 10th 2009 10:30PM
In other news people still completely ignore most advertising... moving on!
DavidMar 11th 2009 8:15AM
Thank God for RSS feeds...