Add your comments
DLS Archives
May 2013
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
Essential Windows Apps | Do Not Track | Microsoft Office | SayNow | LibreOffice | Zeam Android Launcher | Dead Space iPhone | Firefox 4 Mobile | Firefox 4 Release | PlayStation iPhone App | Excel Tips | Android Launcher | Google One Pass | Dead Space | Google Cloud Print | Songbird for Android | NBA Jam | Internet Explorer 9 | Windows 7 Connector for Mac | Office Mac 2011 | IE9 RC
Gadget News
- Hangouts upgrade disables outbound Google Voice calls in desktop Gmail, company promises it will return 'soon'
- IRL: TYLT cables and a standoff between two Galaxies
- Photos of a new Samsung Galaxy S 4 emerge, could it be the Active?
- United Airlines puts Dreamliner back in the air after four-month grounding






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
NYScottFeb 3rd 2009 4:58PM
Once again proving that people will complain about Microsoft just to complain about Microsoft. Tell me, what's wrong with having options? If you only want to use "X," do you want to be forced to pay for Y and Z, too? If you can only afford $, wouldn't you rather have a couple options costing $, instead of one single version costing $$$?
As for the netbook issue, that's a tough call; do you lose money by charging less for more, and do you make owners of other hardware devices subsidize those losses? My initial opinion is to support the installation of the lower-cost editions, and if consumers want to upgrade to Home Premium, they'll have to pay. Of course, they'll complain about that, too...
(Unverified)Feb 3rd 2009 7:27PM
The problem is that most of the time I want X and Y, but I do not want Z, E, and T. So I have to pay $$ more on top of $ just to have Y.
I really think they should just sell everything for 99$, everyone will buy it. Even me.