Add your comments
DLS Archives
May 2012
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
Essential Windows Apps | Do Not Track | Microsoft Office | SayNow | LibreOffice | Zeam Android Launcher | Dead Space iPhone | Firefox 4 Mobile | Firefox 4 Release | PlayStation iPhone App | Excel Tips | Android Launcher | Google One Pass | Dead Space | Google Cloud Print | Songbird for Android | NBA Jam | Internet Explorer 9 | Windows 7 Connector for Mac | Office Mac 2011 | IE9 RC
Gadget News
- Insert Coin: Modkit Micro asks us if we're ready for six-year-olds coding Arduino boards
- Google patents view augmentation method and glasses, sees what you cannot
- Dell announces Inspiron One 23 and One 20 all-in-ones (video)
- Dell adds XPS One 27 with 2560 x 1440 screen to its all-in-one lineup, prices start at $1,399 (video)






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
(Unverified)Jan 30th 2009 1:07PM
The University of Akron requires all student organizations to use "Editor2" page editor as the only option for creating websites. Two years ago, we used to have the freedom to design how we wanted, but now we have to use this system. It wouldn't be too bad if the system was standards compliant, or easy to use. According to the web master, the reason everyone has to use the system is because "people who are unfamiliar with web design may have to edit the web sites" and they don't want "broken" web sites on their server. If someone can't figure out web design, they will never be able to figure out this page editor. Using this editor it's not even possible to generate a page that doesnt contain errors on W3C's code validator.
Here's a screen shot; http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/159889/Images/editor2.JPG
(Unverified)Jan 30th 2009 1:16PM
Whoa. There is no such thing as a "root canal enema" but, if there were, I would imagine it to look almost exactly like that editor.
(Unverified)Jan 31st 2009 3:54AM
Wow... I was thinking about voting for Office 2007 and the guy who mentioned top 10 lists with slideshow setups definitely has a point, but this piece of shit really takes the cake. Good luck making a website with that garbage that a 10 year old couldn't make with raw html in a text editor.
(Unverified)Jan 31st 2009 11:42AM
If anyone has any advice on how to get my University to change their policy and allow more freedom and forward thinking in their web design, any help would be appreciated. :-) I'm tired of this editor2.
(Unverified)Jan 31st 2009 4:13PM
"If anyone has any advice on how to get my University to change their policy and allow more freedom and forward thinking in their web design,"
Get all of the affected organizations to just simply NOT use it. Hopefully, when the powers that be realize that the school has practically no web content and that nobody is using their beloved editor, they might be more willing to listen to sense.
You have to remember, the best way to prevent a bad decision from getting reversed is to blindly follow along. In this case, that would be putting up with the bad editor and using it anyway. Don't do it!