5 Apps You Run That Suck, and 5 Replacements That Don't
If you frequent our site (and you do, because you're cool), you've probably read this article about the 5 most annoying apps on your PC. Well, it's time for another installment - this time with alternatives that offer the functionality you want without the annoying, fetid bloat that you don't. Note: before the gripes start, to compare apples to apples I'm only offering apps that need to be installed - no portable apps, no web apps. Ahead Nero
There was a time when Nero wasn't an overblown pig of a recording application, but over the years it's been "improved" to the glorious state of excess you see it in today. What sucks about Nero today? Well, let's see. First, it tries to install the Ask toolbar during setup. Then there's the hundreds of megs of DVD templates it piles on (none of them particularly attractive). Last but not least, there's Nero Scout. Has anyone ever found this useful? I don't know about you, but click and drag or browsing for files has always worked just fine for me.
The Alternative: CD Burner XP
I want burning software to burn discs, not transcode video, play media, serve it over my home lan, print labels, and scour my drives constantly for files I may want to burn. Not only is CD Burner XP free, it's also miniscule when compared to Nero, installs in seconds, not minutes, and doesn't bring any excess crap along with it. Launch it, and you're given clear choices: data, music, iso, copy, erase. The dual pane view makes creating compilations drag-and-drop easy, as does the totally slick dropbox.

Adobe Reader
The PDF is a great idea: a platform independent document that's immune to the usual formatting issues. Again, ages ago Acrobat Reader was a fine choice. Things were obviously spiraling out of control when Adobe introduced the Speed Launch in attempt to help this slug of an app launch slightly faster. Soon the installer started trying to cram a toolbar down your throat (I see a pattern here....) and things just keep getting worse.
The Alternative: Foxit PDF Reader
I'd wager that you can open and close Foxit about half a dozen times before Reader finishes launching once. It's 92% smaller and still manages to render PDFs very accurately. What more can you say? A PDF reader should, well, read PDFs. It doesn't need to do any other fancy crap.
WinZip
Believe it or not, there are still a ton of people using WinZip. During the install, I noticed winzip112.msi extracting, so I decided to investigate. I mean, why not just let users download only the 6.5mb .msi? Well, because they're trying to sneak Uniblue Registry Booster and the Google Desktop and Toolbar past you. Nice. Winzip's main window consumes 11mb of memory whilst doing nothing. doesn't support .7z archives, and costs $29.95 to register after a 45-day trial. Oh wait - you can get the full version free if you complete a TrialPay offer. Gee, thanks!
The Alternative: 7-Zip
While it stands to reason that 7-Zip supports .7z files (hell, it'll even unpack DEB and RPM packages), there are plenty of reasons to dump WinZip for it. The .msi is 1.1mb, it consumes less than 20% the drive space of WinZip after installation, and it's totally free. It even does a slightly better job at re-packing the WinZip installer files than WinZip does.
BitCometWhy anyone would ever want to install this piece of trash torrent manager is totally beyond me, yet 65 million Cnet users (I hear your snickering) have done just that. It's a 6mb download, doubles in size after install, eats 26mb of memory when running even when it's idle, tries to change your homepage, and it pops up more alerts windows than most antivirus apps. The interface as more cluttered with junk than Fred Sanford's back yard. BitComet is so evil, Satan actually forces people in Hell to use it.
The Alternative: uTorrent
If you're already using it, thank you for raising the average level of torrent user intelligence. If you're not, here's why you should be: it's a 214kb download (about 4% the size of BitComet), expands to about 300kb when installed with the webUI, and uses only 6mb of memory when idle. uTorrent will download just as fast as BitComet (if not faster, in my experience), it's interface is neat and clean, and the webUI lets you control your torrents from anywhere.
iTunes
I can hear the Apple fanbois cringe, but here we go! I'm not sure how many of you wanted a horrible video player like Quicktime, a ho-hum browser like Safari, and a..er...life synching(?) tool like MobileMe to come packaged with your media manager, but I didn't. I wanted a program that would take my songs, pics, and whatnot and dump them
on to my player. iTunes is a behemoth, and the fact that Apple has no qualms about cramming any half-baked app they dream up into its installer irritates me to no end.The Alternative: EphPod
EphPod is 3.6mb and it's just EphPod. You won't have to dodge any unwanted installers, and it can handle pretty much any iPod chore: syncing, firmware updates, calendar, contact, news, and weather updates. EphPod is easy on resources and boasts a clean, straightforward interface. You don't have to worry about setting the manual updates option. No, it doesn't handle video files, but I don't care, because I don't want to watch a movie on a screen the size of a Ritz cracker.













Comments
97
Subscribe to commentsfreewarepickerAug 6th 2008 1:16PM
IZArc can surpass many zip utilities. More zip utilities at http://freewarepicker.110mb.com/yzip.html
westudiAug 6th 2008 4:10PM
I don't use any of those programs, but do use a few of the alternatives.
JhonAug 6th 2008 8:43PM
i am a big proponent of utorrent; but then recently have been testing out http://www.binarynotions.com/halite-bittorrent-client Halite Bittorent; and its seems pretty damn good.
(also i love the old utorrent; dont like how it keeps getting heavier and heavier - such crap)
JonathanAug 7th 2008 7:07AM
IZArc is by far the best zip utility out there. http://www.izarc.org/
Tons of formats and I love just right clicking on archived folders and extracting them from there.
Also, I get a 403 error when trying to visit 7-Zip's website.
RicoAug 31st 2008 6:06PM
WinRAR is the best replacement, dollar for dollar, for WinZip, but on the freeware side 7-Zip and PeaZip are the best ones.
@Jonatan: IZArc was not updated for more than one year, I had many problems in opening archives created with IZArc with other archivers, and on the support forum there are very old unresolved (and unresponded) bug reports... use what you like more, but my impression was not good at all.
Finibus BonorumAug 7th 2008 1:44AM
dislodge112 said...
"...ephpod hasn't been updated since 1980..."
Incredible! That would mean that this program originated way back in the early DOS & CP/M era...even before integrated multimedia sound on personal computers such as the Amiga [1985]
AnwinAug 7th 2008 8:55AM
Hehehe... beautiful post and very very useful as always :)
RafaelAug 7th 2008 9:34AM
Is there an iTunes alternative that will automatically sync new songs added to a directory?
I dont like iTunes, I only use it to sync my music to my ipod ocasionally but having to manually add new songs to my library sucks. I can´t believe Apple hasn´t (or doesn´t want to ) add this feature.
I might just have to pay for mediamonkey.
Genius JonesAug 8th 2008 1:38PM
7-Zip is so great, I can't believe anyone even attempts to use WinZip any more.
If you have a Mac, and you want to avoid Toast, which any sane person would, give LiquidCD by Maconnect a try. It's a free alternative that does everything Toast does, better, and free.
http://www.maconnect.ch/index.php?page=liquidcd&lang=en
DwindleAug 8th 2008 4:36PM
Agreed - I use most of those apps for just the same reason. However, uTorrent above v1.6 is owned by Record execs, so I don't trust it - find the old version. I don't use anything like iTunes - I installed Rockbox on my player (replacement os) and now I just drag and drop files. I listen to a lot of audio books, many with over 1,000 files in 15 directories, and building playlists blows. Other recommendations: Smart Defrag (instead of Diskeeper) for defragmenting (free, Vista compatible), Paragon partition manager instead of Partition Magic, and Allway sync for backups and synchronization.
PipedreamergreyAug 21st 2008 6:06AM
My one criticism of UTorrent is that it doesn't handle parts of torrents as conveniently as BitComet. It doesn't say in the main interface what size the pieces you're downloading are or what percentage you've downloaded unless you're downloading the complete torrent. It's a bit irritating.
Rob DunnSep 17th 2008 9:34AM
I favor IZarc instead of 7Zip...
ChrisSep 22nd 2008 3:14AM
I tried CD Burner XP for quite a time. It had a nasty habit of closing my Rewritable discs even though I specified that it shouldn't. In the end I threw it out and installed a lean customised version of Nero again. I don't understand why it has to be quite so huge but it is.
GopNov 11th 2008 4:53AM
Personally, I used uTorrent before switching to BitComet. With uTorrent I got under half the speed I got using BitComet. uTorrent may take less memory, but it sucks :\
typeoholicOct 28th 2008 3:05PM
I agree with this post, save for the 7-zip proggie. My personal alternative preference to Winzip is WinRar. Mind you, it is not free, and I do realize that is a factor the author of this posting had in mind when referencing these tools, but free or not, I still prefer WinRar. Don't ask! ;)
JustinOct 29th 2008 8:35PM
Get yourself a Mac. Solves all your problems.
MayankNov 2nd 2008 10:30PM
True list man!
Keep it up!