Add your comments
DLS Archives
May 2013
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
Essential Windows Apps | Do Not Track | Microsoft Office | SayNow | LibreOffice | Zeam Android Launcher | Dead Space iPhone | Firefox 4 Mobile | Firefox 4 Release | PlayStation iPhone App | Excel Tips | Android Launcher | Google One Pass | Dead Space | Google Cloud Print | Songbird for Android | NBA Jam | Internet Explorer 9 | Windows 7 Connector for Mac | Office Mac 2011 | IE9 RC
Gadget News
- LG's 5-inch HD Oxide mobile display has a 1mm-slim bezel, we go eyes-on at SID
- LoJack for Android to be embedded in Samsung Galaxy S4's firmware
- Cricket launching Galaxy S 4 on June 7th, starting at $55 down
- HTC Asia CEO Lennard Hoornik is the latest reported exec departure (update: Head of Global Digital Service as well)






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
ICWienerApr 16th 2008 6:17PM
I'd suspect some bean counter has figured this out, but it's hard to imagine someone downloading so much that they are effectively losing money on you.
It would seem to make more sense to let you keep paying and limit your downloads than to cut you off completely and lose a year's worth of income from you.
Why not do something like the first few hundred GB a month at 100% of your rated speed, the next batch at 75% and continuing down from there.