Court to RIAA: Making songs available isn't enough for a lawsuit
A federal judge in New york has ruled that the RIAA cannot sue people for simply making copyrighted music available for download. Rather, the recording industry needs to demonstrate that someone has actually downloaded the file. Otherwise, it's not clear that a crime actually took place.
It's much trickier to demonstrate that someone actually downloaded the files you made available. And when we say you, we mean the figurative you. We're quite confident that no Download Squad readers are actually violating the law. This particular case isn't over yet, since the RIAA feels it can demonstrate that the defendent actually distributed copyrighted files, and didn't just make them available.
The judge in the case also found that while making files available might not be enough to justify a lawsuit, an "offer to distribute" copyrighted works is. What's the difference? If you don't password protect your WiFi router, your neighbors might be able to download files from your computer, which you've "made available." But if you designate a folder on your PC that has files you're willing to share with other Limewire users, that might be construed as an "offer to distribute."
It's much trickier to demonstrate that someone actually downloaded the files you made available. And when we say you, we mean the figurative you. We're quite confident that no Download Squad readers are actually violating the law. This particular case isn't over yet, since the RIAA feels it can demonstrate that the defendent actually distributed copyrighted files, and didn't just make them available.
The judge in the case also found that while making files available might not be enough to justify a lawsuit, an "offer to distribute" copyrighted works is. What's the difference? If you don't password protect your WiFi router, your neighbors might be able to download files from your computer, which you've "made available." But if you designate a folder on your PC that has files you're willing to share with other Limewire users, that might be construed as an "offer to distribute."













Comments
8
Subscribe to commentsToddApr 2nd 2008 5:46PM
"...the recordign [ sic ] industry needs to demonstrate that someone has actually downloaded the file...It's much trickier to demonstrate that someone actually downloaded the files you made available."
Sure is, made even trickier if you share your WiFi and set it to anonymous access with one of these:
https://shop.fon.com/FonShop/shop/US/ShopController
BrianApr 2nd 2008 6:19PM
Score one for the good guys?
MichaelApr 2nd 2008 7:11PM
Ladies and gents,
The RIAA just got a right good teabagging.
Let us celebrate.
ZeRoApr 2nd 2008 10:14PM
Totally unnecessary...
ShaunApr 3rd 2008 6:37AM
"We're quite confident that no Download Squad readers are actually violating the law."
Really? How?
Brad LinderApr 3rd 2008 6:42AM
Tongue, meet cheek.
stomperApr 3rd 2008 12:22PM
PRIEST! PRIEST! PRIEST!
James BrownApr 4th 2008 12:18PM
if they are so concerned with down loads and illegal copy. where are the complaints about SIRIUS and broadcast radio again. anyone can record edit and play. this not about piracy but about bigger bucks