Add your comments
DLS Archives
May 2013
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
Essential Windows Apps | Do Not Track | Microsoft Office | SayNow | LibreOffice | Zeam Android Launcher | Dead Space iPhone | Firefox 4 Mobile | Firefox 4 Release | PlayStation iPhone App | Excel Tips | Android Launcher | Google One Pass | Dead Space | Google Cloud Print | Songbird for Android | NBA Jam | Internet Explorer 9 | Windows 7 Connector for Mac | Office Mac 2011 | IE9 RC
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
(Unverified)Mar 27th 2008 3:40PM
nice, but ..... :-S
From General Terms and conditions...
--------------------------------------
8. Use of Your Content.
Adobe does not claim ownership of Your Content. However, with respect to Your Content that you submit or make available for inclusion on publicly accessible areas of the Services, you grant Adobe a worldwide, royalty-free, nonexclusive, perpetual, irrevocable, and fully sublicensable license to use, distribute, derive revenue or other remuneration from, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, publicly perform and publicly display such Content (in whole or in part) and to incorporate such Content into other Materials or works in any format or medium now known or later developed.
--------------------------------------
do you think the same as me....?
JKLionheartMar 27th 2008 4:37PM
Wow, that's terrible. Definitely a big deal if you're even half-serious about your photos... good catch.
MysteriusMar 27th 2008 4:40PM
I'm guessing they pulled some generic clause for advertising use, but I agree they ought to go back and find a more appropriate clause specifically for this service.
(Unverified)Mar 28th 2008 10:40AM
Very good catch! I'm with Mysterious, I think it was just a generic clause so they can use images from the public gallery view or what-have you for advertising/promotional efforts, but yes -- this should be clarified.
From reading it, the description of the defacto License makes it seem very similar to the broadest CreativeCommons license (though clearly not actually a CreativeCommons license). Honestly, this is something that bothers me, but I don't think it will be any issue at all for 99% of people who are interested in using the service (and the audience this is aimed at, especially). It looks like its a CYA thing so that if they use a screenshot for a print ad or something, they don't have to get specific rights for any photo that might appear in that ad -- though I'd imagine that they would use professionally done mock-ups for most of their featured photos anyway.