UK iPhone reactions mixed, loud
With UK-based Carphone Warehouse estimating first-day sales of Apple's iPhone at 10,000 or more, observers in England are beginning to gripe about the same things American iPhone consumers have been griping about since last spring. Where to begin? The servers used to activate the phones can't handle the massive swell of eager consumers unboxing and activating their iPhones. There's no Skype. Lack of 3G network support. Incomplete Bluetooth support. A persistent inability to develop anything besides web-based apps for the thing.
Apple took steps to rectify at least some of these concerns by announcing a Software Developer's Kit, a seemingly tardy bit of news. Some believe this tardiness had more to do with the timing of Leopard's release than with the eventuality of third-party apps on the iPhones. We just think Apple got caught off guard and made an error in judgment by telling the world, "hey, it has Safari and that's enough." (As if.) Apparently, even Chinese phone hackers demonstrate that a better development environment is needed, despite having no 'official' network to connect their iPhones to.
Now the rumor mill is really crackling with promise, though. It seems that O2, the mobile operator who plays AT&T in the British iPhone analogy, may not be gifted with the same tolerant regulatory attitude that greeted the exclusive AT&T deal in the United States, meaning there are people in the UK pushing for an actual legislative termination of the O2 exclusive. And, while everybody's been waiting to hear what content partnerships Apple has up its sleeve for this touchscreen-enabled golden goose, it appears YouTube may be among the first to pony up a tasty third-party add-on for the iPhone.
Apple took steps to rectify at least some of these concerns by announcing a Software Developer's Kit, a seemingly tardy bit of news. Some believe this tardiness had more to do with the timing of Leopard's release than with the eventuality of third-party apps on the iPhones. We just think Apple got caught off guard and made an error in judgment by telling the world, "hey, it has Safari and that's enough." (As if.) Apparently, even Chinese phone hackers demonstrate that a better development environment is needed, despite having no 'official' network to connect their iPhones to.
Now the rumor mill is really crackling with promise, though. It seems that O2, the mobile operator who plays AT&T in the British iPhone analogy, may not be gifted with the same tolerant regulatory attitude that greeted the exclusive AT&T deal in the United States, meaning there are people in the UK pushing for an actual legislative termination of the O2 exclusive. And, while everybody's been waiting to hear what content partnerships Apple has up its sleeve for this touchscreen-enabled golden goose, it appears YouTube may be among the first to pony up a tasty third-party add-on for the iPhone.













Comments
4
Subscribe to commentsStephenNov 14th 2007 10:17PM
The fact that O2 wanted to the the Iphone network really makes me laugh.
Back when they were "Cellnet" they didn't show phones in their TV adverts. Their philosophy was that people would be interested in the network and wouldn't care about what the phones looked like.
I'm sure reading they had lost a lot of ground on the other British networks because of that mistake. Back when I could get dozens different phones on the other networks, Cellnet were trying to get people to take phones that were hopelessly out of date because they bought them in such huge numbers thinking no one would mind.
StephenNov 14th 2007 10:32PM
...Deliberately no phone in the ads
Because people don't care about what phones look like :)
azum5Nov 15th 2007 12:01AM
It is funny that Google will pay you $10,000,000 to develop good apps for their phone platform while Apple had to be literally pushed even to publish an sdk.
Dave ForsterNov 15th 2007 4:50AM
People who buy this thing and don't like it have only themselves to blame... and probably too much money. The lack of a decent specification (ipod / touchscreen aside) is old news... and to think about paying £270 for the phone to get locked into an 18 month contract (minimum) at £35/month (minimum) is mental !! thats a minimum of £900 before you make a call or download a track ! eek!
apologies for my overuse of the word minimum!