What's Steve Jobs got against buttons?
The buttonless iPhone, and the sleek styling of other apple products, has taken the Wall Street Journal to musing, "What's Steve's Beef about buttons."According to the article, Jobs' blood-lust for buttons goes back further than you might imagine. "Mr. Jobs was adamant that the keyboard for the original Macintosh not include "up," "down," "right" and "left" keys that allow users to move the cursor around their computer screens, giving it a sleeker appearance," at the cost of utility.
But, in a world where multi-touch technology is allowing buttons to disappear, it looks like real Steve is getting his wish.












Comments
9
Subscribe to commentsAlex PolonskyJul 25th 2007 10:40PM
good, i hate buttons too.
Dr RumbleJul 25th 2007 10:46PM
Apple... Pssh.
EliotJul 25th 2007 11:12PM
Tactile buttons? Bah, what are you blind?
Andrew CunninghamJul 26th 2007 12:11AM
> Mr. Jobs was adamant that the keyboard for the
> original Macintosh not include "up," "down,"
> "right" and "left" keys that allow users to move
> the cursor around their computer screens, giving it > a sleeker appearance," at the cost of utility.
Actually, my understanding was that they wanted to force the users to use the mouse instead of the arrow keys.
Andrew CunninghamJul 26th 2007 12:14AM
Oops, justread the article and they actually mention my above point!
SchmappelJul 26th 2007 4:20AM
"Ooooh... What does this button do?"
johnnyg0Jul 26th 2007 9:41AM
Playing games is sooo much easier without those annoying up/down/left/right buttons, they're always in the way!
I just can wait to see the next touchscreen Xbox360 controller.
C'MON PEOPLE! Don't you understand buttons have a purpose? Have you ever wanted to change the volume on an iPod without having to take it out of your pocked and look at it? Have you ever used a touchscreen TV remote? Tell me you still hate buttons after using one of those..
Too much buttons can be bad, but none can sure be annoying.
I'm sure even Steve's TV remote has buttons.
Peter KirnJul 26th 2007 12:28PM
In Steve's defense (well, sort of, anyway), the "Cursor Keys" incident was not some kind of anti-button tirade. The situation is well-documented in Mac lore. The concern was -- probably rightful at the time -- that people might rely heavily on the cursor keys instead of using the mouse as a pointing device. Sleekness I think was a secondary benefit.
Yeah, it sounds silly now, but if you imagine yourself at that time, you can see the argument.
What it DOES demonstrate is that Steve is willing to jettison conventional wisdom (good), sometimes reducing functionality in the process (can be bad).
JamesJul 26th 2007 6:07PM
Of course, in Steve's infinite wisdom, he ignored that maybe people would use cursor keys instead of a mouse because they're vastly more efficient for a number of tasks. As johnnyg points out, there are some tasks you wish to perform "eyes off", and without tactile buttons, well, good luck. Nobody will ever, ever, *ever* win an international text-messaging championship with the iPhone keyboard, because your body just works better when you can feel where things are.
I hate the move towards touchscreen everything. Consider the grocery store: how many times did you hit "OK" or "YES" on a credit card terminal with raised buttons and had the button press not go through? How many times did that happen when you tap the "OK" or "YES" button on a touchscreen? If you're like most people, the latter happens a whole lot more often than the former, because you know exactly where you can touch the real button regardless of the angle you're looking at it from, and a well-designed tactile button will give you a "click" feeling when you have activated it. Touch screens are 0-for-2.