Add your comments
DLS Archives
May 2012
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
Essential Windows Apps | Do Not Track | Microsoft Office | SayNow | LibreOffice | Zeam Android Launcher | Dead Space iPhone | Firefox 4 Mobile | Firefox 4 Release | PlayStation iPhone App | Excel Tips | Android Launcher | Google One Pass | Dead Space | Google Cloud Print | Songbird for Android | NBA Jam | Internet Explorer 9 | Windows 7 Connector for Mac | Office Mac 2011 | IE9 RC
Gadget News
- ASUS teases its 'next transformations,' will probably have screens (video)
- Batman-themed Nokia Lumia 900 coming soon, utility belt clip not included
- Absinthe 2.0 used to jailbreak nearly one million iOS devices in a single weekend
- GameStop gives in to its sweet tooth, stocks Android tablets at over 1,600 stores
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
(Unverified)Jun 22nd 2007 5:56PM
Peter - Why would you need a room of separate servers if you're a small company? All the server software components can reside on one or two machines, no matter what software you're using. The number of clients determines how much you need to divide the workload between different machines -- not what kind of server OS you're using. A separate OS aimed at smaller businesses would only be beneficial if there were some cost benefit, like a lower price for the license or integration of other components that normally need to be purchased separately. Maybe that's what they did here, but who knows.