Add your comments
DLS Archives
May 2012
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
Essential Windows Apps | Do Not Track | Microsoft Office | SayNow | LibreOffice | Zeam Android Launcher | Dead Space iPhone | Firefox 4 Mobile | Firefox 4 Release | PlayStation iPhone App | Excel Tips | Android Launcher | Google One Pass | Dead Space | Google Cloud Print | Songbird for Android | NBA Jam | Internet Explorer 9 | Windows 7 Connector for Mac | Office Mac 2011 | IE9 RC
Gadget News
- Absinthe 2.0 used to jailbreak nearly one million iOS devices in a single weekend
- Batman-themed Nokia Lumia 900 coming soon, utility belt clip not included
- GameStop gives in to its sweet tooth, stocks Android tablets at over 1,600 stores
- Angry Birds and PES 2012 join Skype: won't work on Windows Phones with 256MB RAM






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
(Unverified)Jun 15th 2007 12:39AM
As I was taught in my Intro to Economics class, patents intended to return the externalities (outside benefits) to a company, and this is to encourage research and development. There are some research areas that need "encouragement". But some ideas would be developed without needing any encouragement (like those in competitive areas, such as the latest OS wars), and that's why they have the "obvious to one skilled in the profession" limitation.
Looking at it this way, I think areas in software that actually need extra encouragement from patent rights are VERY rare.