Facebook Plunges Again
Tumblr 101: Tips And Tricks To Get Started
Run Linux apps on Windows or OS X with Lina
Next month a California-based startup plans to release an application that will allow Windows, Mac, and Linux users run Linux binaries without any modifications. Lina is a Linux virtual machine that allows users to run applications with the native look of their host operating system. It also lets you install applications with a mouse-click, no need to compile software from source code.
The idea is that developers will be able to create programs for one platform, and they'll be able to run on three different operating systems. This could both expand the market for open source Linux applications, and cut down work for developers. Lina will be free for open source developers, while a licensing fee will apply to commercial developers.
Lina is still a work in progress, with no support for GTK+ or USB peripherals yet. The virtual machine takes up less than 40MB when installed.
[via Slashdot and Linux Devices]
The idea is that developers will be able to create programs for one platform, and they'll be able to run on three different operating systems. This could both expand the market for open source Linux applications, and cut down work for developers. Lina will be free for open source developers, while a licensing fee will apply to commercial developers.
Lina is still a work in progress, with no support for GTK+ or USB peripherals yet. The virtual machine takes up less than 40MB when installed.
[via Slashdot and Linux Devices]
Comments
26
Subscribe to commentsaleenm88May 27th 2007 10:57PM
who would want that? should't be backwared? run windows or mac apps on Linux
MeMay 27th 2007 10:58PM
Hurrah! Finally, Amarok on Windows!
KevinMay 27th 2007 10:58PM
I don't see the point. GTK has already been ported to Windows and is in the process of being ported to OS X. Qt apps already run pretty much everywhere (Skype being an example). All it takes for both in many cases is a recompile. This is more than a little redundant, especially since these programs can be run natively.
noakMay 28th 2007 8:10AM
I actually read about it first here:
http://ostoolbox.blogspot.com/2007/05/lina-linux-applications-on-windows-and.html
Seems like this solution depends on implementing system call support for each GUI toolkit supported.
poopadoopMay 28th 2007 10:30PM
Retarded... Just use linux on OSX and avoid windows! :)
SteveMay 28th 2007 10:30PM
I dont get it....these people talk too fast and their video sucks
MattMay 28th 2007 10:30PM
JAVA Anyone?
dudeMay 28th 2007 10:30PM
Yeah, I liked this concept better, back when it was called JAVA.
Markus SorenssonMay 28th 2007 10:30PM
Is that a guy and a girl or two lesbians?
MattMay 29th 2007 7:34AM
@7 - Java in the Status Quo too slow on most compies =[
jakMay 29th 2007 7:34AM
I can see using this to test drive certain apps before doing a switch to Linux. There are two Windows apps I use daily and if I knew that linux equivalents existed and worked the way I want I would make the switch myself.
AriMay 29th 2007 7:34AM
Why did they use nano as an example when it already comes with OS X as a native console binary?
AnonMay 29th 2007 7:34AM
I totally thought the person on the left was a decent looking girl, and the guy on the right was ugly.
devonMay 29th 2007 7:35AM
java solves this problem, but from the sounds of it the luna project extends cross platform to many other languages which is a plus
Smoke TetsuMay 29th 2007 7:36AM
I for one would want to use this if you could get The GIMP running through it as that is really the only "Linux" app and I put that in quotations because The GIMP isn't strictly a Linux app. But I would like this if it meant The GIMP becomes more integrated than using it through X11 which it looks like it would be.
Also I think there is enough room for projects like thisbecause first of all it doesn't seem like the native GTK for OS X would integrated the menu bar and such the same way as this does and even on windows this might seem more native than the GTK port there. On there even though there is a theme that takes your system skin and apply it to the application it still looks and feels very much like a foreign application.
I just wonder how much of an overhead there would be with this particularly on the PowerPC.. or if it requires Intel (on the Mac) or what.
MagikMan74May 29th 2007 9:52AM
guy/girl debate aside, and the validity or useability of this aside.... did anyone else run out of breathe reading #15?
alexMay 29th 2007 1:09PM
this is great... i would like to use linux but am stuck on WinXP right now. There are some apps which only are developed for *nix that i would like to have available to me.
EricMay 29th 2007 1:13PM
Okay, so what? Most of us want our Windows Apps on Linux, not the other way around.
Call me when you can run Windows Apps seamlessly in Linux. Until then, I'll continue using Windows XP and Vista.
devMay 29th 2007 5:00PM
Why???
Most of linux applications have a windows, osx ports.
Hellooo, hello anybody there... "Open Source"...
devMay 29th 2007 5:00PM
Why???
Most of linux applications have a windows, osx ports.
Hellooo, hello anybody there... "Open Source"...