Add your comments
DLS Archives
May 2012
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
Essential Windows Apps | Do Not Track | Microsoft Office | SayNow | LibreOffice | Zeam Android Launcher | Dead Space iPhone | Firefox 4 Mobile | Firefox 4 Release | PlayStation iPhone App | Excel Tips | Android Launcher | Google One Pass | Dead Space | Google Cloud Print | Songbird for Android | NBA Jam | Internet Explorer 9 | Windows 7 Connector for Mac | Office Mac 2011 | IE9 RC
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
(Unverified)Mar 21st 2007 1:47PM
I love how all the mac users are saying "switch to mac" when Adobe doesn't even have native binary support for the Intel macs. Keep in mind they have been out for over a year longer than Vista. To run adobe apps - they have to go through Rosetta
"emulation" which is PAINFULLY slow and certainly not bug-free.
Adobe says when native binary support comes out for Intel macs it will be in the form on a new product - just like their Vista lineup. So what's the difference? You want people to switch to mac so they can run Photoshop in emulated mode on mac?
I run Dreamweaver and Photoshop on Vista with no problems - and it's a great deal faster than on my mac that cost me $1000 more.