Add your comments
DLS Archives
May 2012
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
Essential Windows Apps | Do Not Track | Microsoft Office | SayNow | LibreOffice | Zeam Android Launcher | Dead Space iPhone | Firefox 4 Mobile | Firefox 4 Release | PlayStation iPhone App | Excel Tips | Android Launcher | Google One Pass | Dead Space | Google Cloud Print | Songbird for Android | NBA Jam | Internet Explorer 9 | Windows 7 Connector for Mac | Office Mac 2011 | IE9 RC
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
(Unverified)Feb 26th 2007 12:14PM
Ron, I didn't mean to say that BitTorrent's service or offering were inferior to the other companies. But its brand recognition is much lower. If BitTorrent was the first company to offer a legal video download service, or if they were offering a service that was vastly different and superior to their competitors, perhaps they could gain a significant market share or even dominate the market. We've seen plenty of companies with little name recognition become huge successes on the internet.
But the folks who already know about BitTorrent are largely people who use the technology to get content for free, and they're not going to be that excited about the ability to pay for something they can already do for free. And I just don't see the rest of the world jumping on the BitTorrent bandwagon when they can get a similar experience from Amazon or Apple.