Don't click it
Here is an interesting site that is very different in terms of its user interface. The weird thing is that the site itself does not want you to click on it (after the first time). The entire interface is created in flash and simply lets the mouse-over do all the walking. While I don't think it will catch on in a big way, in is clever, well-done, and like a prototype car, is a good proof of concept. It is hard to not click the site, since everything we do online is based on clicks, but it is possible. I almost don't mind the dontclick.it interface, but it must be an incredibly time-consuming way to build a web interface, and it makes you feel as though you don't have quite so much control over what happens on the page, which is a bit disconcerting. I would tell you to go check it out, but then you would have to click on the link, so that defeats the whole purpose. Oh well.












Comments
8
Subscribe to commentseverythingyellowOct 4th 2006 2:05PM
It would be so hard to resist clicking, but it is something new and different so I could see why people would be interested in it.
Matt PettyOct 4th 2006 1:06PM
I clicked, to see how it works. The window opened up, it told me to 'prepare my mind' and then click one last time to enter the no-click zone. And then I couldn't do anything. Why? Because Flash (AFAIK) can't resize the content to fit the small window I was using. The navigation buttons along the top were off the page, and the warning about minimum screen size requirements was off the left of the screen. This is why I hate 100% Flash-based interfaces, clicky or not.
I, or Flash, could have resized my browser window, but I thought we'd left that kind of prescriptive interface behaviour behind in 1999.
"Please resize your browser to 800x600 to view this page..."
Alex MOct 4th 2006 1:28PM
Meh. They go overboard. It's kind of nice for navigation, if the targets are big enough and the timing is just right (the usual caveats re Flash apply, of course).
But I think other types of actions definitely need the clicks. Dammit, if I'm going to submit an e-mail (or a comment) I want to click a flippin' button.
SeanOct 4th 2006 2:03PM
bah lame.
I use a trackball, and I can't do the fancy "gestures" they suggest for activating buttons.
Also, because mousing over the target actually moves the target, I was getting lost because of unintentional actions.
JoeOct 5th 2006 1:38PM
This is great, I love it. I browsed throught all the content of that website without a single click. And I do feel better without clicking.
This is the way to go, and will change the world!
advationOct 5th 2006 7:07PM
It's an interesting concept, however I found it harder to navigate because of the sites layout and how the site interacted with the actions of the mouse. I feel "clickable" websites still hold the higher ground.
HobofuzzOct 9th 2006 12:12AM
Clicking will never go away.
Clicking on objects and stuff allows us to decide when we want something to open. Having a link just open because we moved our mouse over it is plain silly and impractical.
This is like your car revving up just because your foot hovered over the accelerator. You wouldn't want that, now would you?
I don't like it >.
Mustang 2012Oct 10th 2006 4:57PM
Sorry but this site is horrible. Clicking is natural, and this type of browsing isnt. God forbid you move you mouse a little to one side or the other because you'll wind up on a totally different page.