What Would You Change about Digg?

This week we're going to be taking a cue from a couple of our sister sites and starting a new regular feature called "What Would You Change." Here's the idea: Even the best apps and web services aren't perfect for everybody. Maybe the buttons are in the wrong order, maybe it takes too many clicks to change some setting, or maybe the icon is just the wrong shade of blue. "What Would You Change" is your chance to throw in your two cents.
And what better place to start than one of our favorite web services, Digg? Digg's popularity has been surging essentially since its birth, and the Digg crew have made some updates including a killer redesign a few months back, but no site is perfect. What's the worst thing about Digg? What would you eliminate, what would you revamp, and what would you tweak? Chime in below, and then check back later this week when we'll count up all those two cents and see what it adds up to.












Comments
55
Subscribe to commentsJasonNov 30th 2005 1:52PM
I definitely second the suggestion for threaded comments. Right now the general tone of Digg comments is childish at best. Threads might encourage more substantive discussion, provided a slightly more robust comment rating scheme is put in place. I know it sounds like I'm saying "make Digg more like Slashdot" but the Slashdot model works, Digg's is kind of crippled without threads.
JacobNov 30th 2005 10:48AM
I think digg is great and I visit the site everyday. That being said, the only suggestion I have would be this:
FIX/ADD the blogging feature for Typepad Blogs.
I have tried for months to get this feature to work with my typepad blog and so far no luck. I have even emailed digg to tell them that the feature isn't working with Typepad. So far... No Change.
Pete AshdownNov 30th 2005 11:08AM
Threaded comments plus a category nomination and selection process. Better dupe handling and search with a digg threshold. A variety of themes would be nice.
MattNov 30th 2005 10:57AM
The primary problem that digg faces is duplicate stories and spam. I think that there should be a group of moderators who's only job is to check stories for accuracy and relevance, and also to check for duplicates.
RichardNov 30th 2005 6:22PM
I like Digg but sometimes I think they should make you do an IQ test before you can post...
NateNov 30th 2005 10:59AM
It would be nice if the numbered page links at the bottom were time-based instead of just arbitrary pages. The reasoning for this is that I'm new to digg, but I love the stories so I'm trying to catch up on past posts. I may get to page 25 today, but by tomorrow or next week I can't tell where I left off anymore, without going page by page looking for the last post I viewed.
And being the lazy type, I'd also like a little "open in new window" icon so I don't have to press shift all the time while clicking links. At least that's not an issue at home where I can middle-click. :)
Shaun WebsterNov 30th 2005 11:10PM
perhaps a persistant link checker so nobody is clicking on dead links...
this could take them down and put them back in when they are up...
a link shouldnt be able to be dug if the it's dead.
DIGG RULES!
Quick Online TipsNov 30th 2005 11:08AM
And there are many more Digg tools too.
http://pchere.blogspot.com/2005/09/complete-digg-tools-collection.html
Rod BoothbyNov 30th 2005 11:07AM
Digg needs to expand. It's great, and can be applied in a bunch of interesting areas.
I wrote an article yesterday on how an Enterprise Digg could be used to foster innovation in a company.
If 200 people like your idea, the CEO has to listen.
I would also love to see a DiggNews or a DiggPolitics site.
phDec 1st 2005 7:22AM
different people, different taste. At the moment the digg community is technology focussed. Why not provide multiple diggs with each a different angle? Each they will draw a different audience, and though one can post a story to multiple diggs, the audience will shift through them and keep the diggs different.
So a digg for technology, one for tupperware fanatics and one about lama races in the Andes for starters. why? because they will draw a completely different audience, of course, and a digg on those subjects are much needed...
you get the point :-)
scottNov 30th 2005 12:41PM
I'd like to see a colour and/or icon system for the categories. I find some categories more interesting than others, as I'm sure do most other people. I think a colour and icon system would help me find relevant links much faster and easier. Perhaps also make the categories more specific, for example, add "Astronomy" as a separate (or sub-) category to "Science".
kryptogrowlDec 1st 2005 11:52AM
How about stop over censoring.
David K.Nov 30th 2005 12:35PM
Let's just make digg automatically cross-post any story that makes it on Engadget. I mean, they ALL end up there anyway.
I enjoy digg tremendously, but the incestuous relationship between it and some of the other tech news sites is getting a bit ridiculous.
Jan KabiliNov 30th 2005 4:51PM
I hate having to log in each time I launch digg.
tekmonkeyDec 1st 2005 3:10PM
Digg needs to organize comments better. Some stories recieve hundreds of comments and it's impractical to read them all, paticularily when people are responding to other comments. A reply feature for comments similar to Slashdot's would be useful, but needs to be unique as not to become another Slashdot clone.